[–] SilverAirplane [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Islam condemns terrorism and the murder of innocent people, but the most important fact is always left out of the discussion: Jihad isn't "terrorism" and infidels aren't "innocent." Similarly, Islam can condemn rape while leaving out the most important fact: but it's not rape if it's with an infidel, or with your own property (slave).
[–] HappyMealBullshit ago
Anyone want to start a religion with me where it is "allowed to kill Jews"?
2019-03-10 | ISIS 'wife' defends jihadis' rape and murder of Yazidi women because it is 'allowed in the Quran' | Daily Mail Online
"An ISIS 'wife' has said Yazidi women can be raped as sex slaves because it states prisoners of war are 'property' in the Quran."
'Speaking directly to a mobile phone camera, she described her interpretation of the Quran as a justification for the rape and murder of Yazidi women taken prisoner as sex slaves. ', "Thousands of Yazidi women were forced into sex slavery by their ISIS 'husbands' when their homeland was overrun by militants in 2014."
'International Women Day on Friday, Yazidi worshippers gathered at Lilash Temple in Shikhan in the north of Iraq to remember the thousands killed by ISIS. ', "She said that because the Muslim holy book defines prisoners of war as 'property' they can be treated as objects."
[–] fastregister 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
the guran comforts them, it applauds the turdskins and their behaviour. they would all feel bad and guilty, if the guran said that what they do is a sin. they would not accept the religion, if it didnt celebrate their own subhuman ways. call that spirituality, religion and give them their religous freedom, then die and go to hell.
[–] Approved 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
Well, she's not wrong. The Quran specifically allows the use of property taken during war.
Also, the article's saying "her interpretation of Islam says X" is ridiculous. It's not "her interpretation" of Islam. It's the only fucking way those passages could possibly be read by anyone who knows how to read. There's no fucking "interpretation" involved.
[–] Thingsarenotfriendly 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
I guess you get a gold star for being an expert at Islamic Jurisprudence, fucking hilarious!
[–] Approved ago
Look, Islam is a pretty easy-to-understand religion, once you get past the few overly-complicated parts.
Rule #1 is that Islam is submission to Allah. You're not in a partnership. It's not some sort of arrangement between you and Allah. You submit. In fact, the religion's name "Islam" means "submission".
Rule #2 is that the rules are written down on paper in black-and-white, and it is a CRIME, carrying the same penalty as being an Apostate (death) to try to do what is called "innovation in religion."
To clarify, trying to re-interpret Islam is classified as "innovation in religion" and, literally, carries the death penalty in any place where Sharia law is in force.
So, it's not like Christianity, where some guy in a badly-fitting suit can form a new congregation and start talking about his "interpretation" of the Bible, make up a whole bunch of theories... and then presto-chango, the holy book that says homosexuals are an abomination and should be killed suddenly has been "interpreted" to mean that gays can be priests now.
Something like that would, literally, get you beheaded for innovation/apostacy in Saudi Arabia.
So, no, this chick is not "interpreting" anything. She's simply stating the bald facts of what the Koran says in black-and-white on paper.