0
0

[–] 17243790? ago 

absolutely luminescent

0
1

[–] 17243817? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

no, thanks, mossad

0
0

[–] 17243804? ago 

Would be lulzy to have the following categories:

  1. Open kike

  2. Crypto kike

  3. Part-kike

  4. Shabbos goyim

  5. Glownigger

  6. Shitlib

  7. Literal communist.

0
0

[–] 17243819? ago 

>>12894512

This is a great idea. Mark everyone who ever said some pozzed communist or jewish shit to you at work. Mark all comfirmed jews.

>>12894420

Thanks, CIA.

0
0

[–] 17243812? ago 

Yes. Don't identify friends, only identify enemies.

0
0

[–] 17244851? ago 

All you're doing is identifying yourself. If you want to do something like this, create a separate database, preferably using pencil and paper only, off of the website.

0
0

[–] 17243806? ago 

God yes.

Even if these spergos refuse to identify our friends, we can definitely identify our enemies.

0
0

[–] 17243809? ago 

How pissed off would you be if ‘Neo Nazi White Supreemist website Gab’ identified your normie profile as ‘one of us’?

0
0

[–] 17244143? ago 

Linked in is on the list of apps that facefuck tracks if you don't have a fb account$

Fuck this noise

0
0

[–] 17243797? ago 

Don’t know if glownig or just stupid…

0
0

[–] 17244434? ago  (edited ago)

hard pass. shilling is never a good idea. shilling for gab is just fucktarded.

thank you for letting us all know who dissenter is connected to.