0
1

[–] Betty_Liberty 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Textbook Cognitive Dissonance. Give her a little time, she'll calm down.

0
0

[–] Bravo1XRay ago 

You opened up a can of worms that you can't run from 😁 Kek

0
0

[–] USN7480 ago 

You can't force a redpill. Be patient. The end won't be for everyone.

0
1

[–] LCCVC 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Hmmm.....she is not wrong. Get a car no newer than 2012, ditch the new tv's. Cellphones are spying on you and killing you.

I am not seeing an issue here. She is finally getting redpilled into territory you are not comfortable with it would seem.

0
0

[–] toutedesuite ago 

I assume you are saying that cars up to 2012 did not have the vulnerability now on board every car which allows external takeover through a master computer system — thus all the inexplicable crashes by high visibility people with no attempt at braking, right? Do you know whether a 2012 Volvo C70 T5 would be secure from this?

0
0

[–] LCCVC ago  (edited ago)

I am going off memory. It was standardized in the US all cars received in 2012 with respect to satellite comms. As someone else pointed out it actually goes back to 2004 with respect to sat comms on board and how they communicate with the computer. But in 2012 I believe fed mandate was to allow two way communication with on board computer and outside sources. No US sold vehicle would be safe from this. But it was never really discussed in the public eye as far as I know.

0
0

[–] MystikMa ago 

Actually 2004 was last safe. Cash for Clunkers Obama's baby... to have the power to shut shit down remotely from tractors, transport & personal vehicles spun me more than thoughts of EMP attacks.

0
0

[–] LCCVC ago 

Ahh...ok was not aware of remote shutdown. I remember reading that 2012 on board computers could be communicated to via satellite up-link (which most cars starting in 2012 had equipped standard). But yeah anything with a computer sat comms dating back to 1999 I suppose is susceptible.

0
0

[–] stormymonday ago 

Dude you need to back off, your marriage is more important, I don't talk at all to my wife about this stuff, you need to be subtle about it.

0
0

[–] Lozen2U ago 

It's an immature response to a lack of responsibility and accountability. When we've ignored our responsibility to monitor our government for so long, and hold it accountable, then when we are faced with the consequences, we are overwhelmed and defiant. Holding ourselves accountable for our own failures to surveil our government activities, induces rage and hopelessness and blaming in some people. Perfectly understandable.

0
0

[–] DTrumplican ago 

hahahahahaha

0
0

[–] slwsnowman40 ago 

She's being hormonal/emotional, that's nothing a good lay or a distraction can't fix.

load more comments ▼ (11 remaining)