0
0

[–] 17167549? ago  (edited ago)

No. I’m not a low iq observer. I’m on guard against exactly that: I could say possible analyses of Q that are jarring but my guard is up.

I’ll give one fundamental point: there is absolutely 0% chance that Trump doesn’t sanction Q. He necessarily does. The body of information points to that fact inescapably.

Some of the things a minority of people decode seems to have very little support and disproportionatly large interpretation, and that’s suspect. In fact, it’s EXACTLY how I would run a disinformation op against Q.

This has a very different character. You’re oversimplifying.

0
1

[–] 17167675? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

but my guard is up.

there is absolutely 0% chance that Trump doesn’t sanction Q. He necessarily does. The body of information points to that fact inescapably.

Thes 2 things seem contradictory to me. There is no evidence of trump sancioning q. There isn't even evidence that q is really in insider. There's nothing q has done that couldn't have been done by anyone.

I would like to see what evidence you have though.

0
0

[–] 17168093? ago  (edited ago)

Kid: “Is Q real?” Trump: “I don’t know..... But I know that they’re good people.”

Add that to the Q confirmation style stuff, particularly Q post being negative delta — that leaves plausible deniability but not much more.

As to the majority of people oversimplifying and not “getting it” - that’s just the way the world works. Q can’t increase iq. But he can point the smarter people to how to dig through facts to discover what the msm isn’t spoon feeding them. Almost nobody was doing that before. Now, since Q, there’s more data here (feeding from the Chan trunk) than on some of the strongest alt-news collectors.