[–] 17169844? ago (edited ago)
Dude, I love checkmating the same dumbass over and over and anyone who reads this is going to agree you have lost. Ahhaha I'm a mall cop, then I ask your eat virtualization for breakfast the Q's and it exposed another lie by you. It's fun making you look like the fool you are... You got nothing, have had nothing, and will never have a single thing on me. I run circles around you on here and in real life. You're a poor disgusting slob. So keep it going. It's fun. Go ahead answer my list of questions about virtualization. It wasn't even a hard list I would say just above novice level. And your single answer was bullshit proving you eat nothing but dicks in semen milk for breakfast. So keep it coming douche
[–] 17170122? [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
My house in the big city, my wife and kid, our seaside vacation home, boat and bank account disagrees with you :)
You have none of the above. You have a mental illness.
BTW if you had any clue on virtualization you would know that i´m right, Blart.
ta ta
[–] 17184452? ago
Uh, no, because there is no right answer... Actually it would depend on the workload. And VMware best practices explain that as long as you aren't maxing out the host processing then the ratio you're using is fine. However as a best practice if you're not able to do a baseline test I always just use a 1 to 1 logical processor to virtual process ratio to be on the safe side. Then you can deal with vm sprawl which ALWAYS occurs. Oh and as far as homes go, we have two in Mexico for vacations, and rent homes and 6 here in the states of which 4 are used as rent homes. So I wouldn't assume, but sounds like you're not doing so bad.... ill have to segway over and go boating so we can argue in person because that's something I have yet to make a decision on buying...