[–] AnonAnon123 ago (edited ago)
What the court really did was distinguish between rape and consensual sex, which might make sense in a circumstance with a 16 year old and 18 year old, but not in this case with a 10 year old and an adult.
[–] child_abuse 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
So then, you can only rape the children that follow such cultures. Is it normal in that "perperator's culture" to rape any religion? what if the kid just had a shit after eating bacon and had pork chops the night before?
[–] ZenAtheist 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago (edited ago)
This is a fake article. It takes an old case of a migrant not getting charged with "aggravated rape" and then exaggerates the case to be "NOW FINLAND SAYS YOU CAN FUCK KIDS! HUR DUR"
No. It's horrible, but it's not what it claims to be.
[–] AnonAnon123 ago
The article states that "the courts didn’t recognize the incident as rape, saying the girl wasn’t forced into the sexual act or overcome by fear." That's a pretty bad ruling and even worse than the rapist only getting sentenced to three years. I wouldn't say it's a fake article (I dont know about that actual quality of the source though), but it does have a clickbait title.
[–] cantaloupe6 ago
At the same time they say this:
violently raped a 10-year-old girl when he arrived in Finland.
Makes no sense..
[–] PGLiterati 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Which culture might that be? The murderer's culture?
[–] TexasInfidel ago
Boycott NOKIA