[–] smokratez 3 points -3 points 0 points (+0|-3) 1.8 years ago
Link.
[–] ZenAtheist 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) 1.8 years ago
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because you haven't done enough research yourself doesn't mean that it's everyone else's responsibility to educate you.
[–] matthew-- 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1.8 years ago
OK, I was with you until this point.
Just go find any fucking article, journal entry, report, whatever, and post the link. Why be so fucking lazy?
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" where the fuck did you hear this shit? Even on the wikipedia page that discusses it, it says:
were such an argument to rely imprudently on the lack of research to promote its conclusion, it would be considered an informal fallacy
Your own argument refutes you, moron.
[–] smokratez 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) 1.8 years ago
Ok. You're a faggot.
[–] ZenAtheist 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because you haven't done enough research yourself doesn't mean that it's everyone else's responsibility to educate you.
[–] matthew-- ago
OK, I was with you until this point.
Just go find any fucking article, journal entry, report, whatever, and post the link. Why be so fucking lazy?
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" where the fuck did you hear this shit? Even on the wikipedia page that discusses it, it says:
Your own argument refutes you, moron.
[–] smokratez 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
Ok. You're a faggot.