0
2

[–] kneo24 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

7.52 billion people on the planet. The headline you give estimates only 1 billion affected by this "global food collapse".

Doesn't read the shit they're submitting? How about the editors? Naturalnews has always been a shit tier site. Thanks for further confirming it.

0
0

[–] flyingcuttlefish [S] ago 

the idea of many more than locals dying is because of the spread of nuclear poisoned clouds of fall out circling the globe.

Yes, I read it .... but posting here as the 2 countries are nuclear armed-to-the-teeth and seem to have poor impulse control. You are welcome to disagree. I have no time-machine to tell if the article is correct.

0
0

[–] kneo24 ago 

It isn't about the article being correct. It's about the headline being incongruent with itself and the article.

Had "causing starvation of 1 billion people" been left out of the headline, I would have thought nothing of it.

1
-1

[–] flyingcuttlefish [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

While the nuclear exchange would be regional, the devastation would be global, according to experts. The couple of hundred weapons India and Pakistan possess would be more than enough to create a nuclear winter from the fallout, which would be enough to kill a sizable portion of the earth’s population, if not all of us.

0
0

[–] Jimmycog ago 

Oh no the care factor is 0

0
1

[–] Diggernicks 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Most of those people will be brown though

0
0

[–] Civil_Warrior ago 

We can only hope....

0
0

[–] Inaminit ago 

Why didn't nuclear testing in the 50's & 60's cause problems?

0
0

[–] goatboy ago 

The most likely is a scenario is an EMP that would wipe out electrical systems throughout Asia. India and China would be the most vulnerable as their food dependency relies on a great deal of automation and the shipping.