[–] Level_Cannon ago
That was my reading too and I agree, I feel like we are both missing something in relation to the NASA study. I will have to read through the NASA study closer since the Argo chart we are looking at is just the source material for the study. The NASA researcher must have seen data points that we can't see just from looking at the graph.
I agree :) I keep running into discussions with people on here that end in "well I don't care what you think, I am right and you can't change my mind" which is super frustrating. I will be the first to admit I am wrong if I am shown proof that I am and can't find anything to respond with.
[–] Vanwe ago
I am skeptic by nature. If I don't have access to the information on a claim like NASA is making, I tend to not trust it. Nasa is probably seeing more data than just Argo and NASA is usually pretty good, but I prefer to look at the study. Unfortunately I do not have the time these days to really investigate a lot of stuff.
[–] Level_Cannon ago
Fair enough, I'm the same way sometimes. I will add the link if I come across the study sometime