0
2

[–] 17058714? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

yeah he's like ann coulter: offers his shill-ness services to the highest bidder.

0
3

[–] 17058144? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I don't really understand it. During Ron Paul's run in 2012, Neapolitan seemed to be fairly decent. Then his show was cancelled and he appears to have done a 180. People say FOX is controlled opposition and I believe they are, but who is Napolitano's handler and what do they have on him? I'm stumped.

0
4

[–] 17059340? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Like many others he was a sleeper. Garnered a big following and rep. Then went TDS hoping to sphion off Trump supporters.

0
1

[–] 17060062? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

This!

0
2

[–] 17058690? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I'm stumped too, to be honest. Napolitano is one of the last people I'd expect to be a turncoat.

0
1

[–] 17058920? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Not here. He was a common fixture of most day time Fox shows until he started to wear out his welcome being ani POTUS. About the only one who would have him on lately that I saw was Shepard Smith but luckily Shep has been missing in action lately. So I hope that continues for both of them.

0
10

[–] 17058096? 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

He did a 180 when Fox pulled him off the air for correctly stating that the UK intel agencies were deeply involved in the spying on Trump and his campaign. They obviously got him to 'get in line' after that, which is why he was allowed to return to Fox. Compromised and shilling for the enemy.

0
0

[–] 17066459? ago 

Follow the wives They say Janet was mafia boss her fam is way corrupt

0
0

[–] 17068508? ago 

They're married???

0
0

[–] 17060179? ago 

Hey, I forgot about that! I think you are right about that. It seems ever since he returned, he has been more vocal as an anti-Trump shill.

0
3

[–] 17058089? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

yes yes yes been saying that for months ever since he was dead wrong on the temp appointment of Whitaker, saying it was not legit. Then got embarrassed on TV when someone brought up Vacancies Reform Act

0
1

[–] 17057715? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

He was a bushwhacker deeper stater for surer.

0
3

[–] 17057241? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I bet he has recently started receiving wire transfers.

0
2

[–] 17058133? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Speaking of wire transfers, where's Ann Coulter? I'm not on twitter anymore so I don't see her bs.

0
1

[–] 17059363? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

She was on someones show a day or two ago ...seems she was trying to do damage control. She sux!

0
6

[–] 17057227? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

BIG BIG BIG... Time Shill....

1
-1

[–] 17059443? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Ironic Q fans question his record of predictions coming true but give Q a free pass

0
2

[–] 17060027? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You clearly haven’t followed Q!

Very few false predictions came from Q, but rather eager anons wanting to be predictionfags!(we are all guilty in someway) Q’s main purpose is always being fulfilled....with or without successful predictions.

False interpretations =/= Q’s posts

0
3

[–] 17059643? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I see... you know NOT... Q ... Be gone Evil...

0
5

[–] 17059637? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Ya kno the funny thing about shills? Why on Earth would someone who thinks Q is a larp, be lurking on this board at all? I don't believe in Flat Earth, and I'm certainly not going to lurk on their reddit boards or go to their conferences.

0
3

[–] 17057156? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Yes, he went on a rant that Cohen could have implicated Trump by claiming he knew about the Wikileaks emails. The only problem is that we all knew about Wikileaks emails b/c Assange announced it before they were published.

What an idiot

0
1

[–] 17058056? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Exactly