2
0

[–] MDGAustin 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

Close enough to fry our brains and bodies.

3
1

[–] glassuser 3 points 1 point (+4|-3) ago 

Yeah, if you're using a wideband spread spectrum highly survivable modulation, have very little interference, and absurd receiver sensitivity. Sure, do studies and whatever, it's often surprising what kind of correlation you'll see in effects. But stop with the anti-5g nonsense. It's like a magnet for conspiritards.

2
0

[–] Le_Bucheron 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

Please enlighten me on how safe is 5G.

2
-1

[–] pessimisticsteel 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

So the only critera that matters is that it's "highly survivable"? What kind of fucked up thinking is that?

2
-1

[–] Le_Bucheron 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

5G is just another good reason to stay away from urban areas

0
2

[–] prairie 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Extremely High Frequency waves don't propagate well.

Compared to lower bands, radio waves in this band have high atmospheric attenuation: they are absorbed by the gases in the atmosphere. Therefore, they have a short range and can only be used for terrestrial communication over about a kilometer. Absorption by humidity in the atmosphere is significant except in desert environments, and attenuation by rain (rain fade) is a serious problem even over short distances.

At typical power densities they are blocked by building walls and suffer significant attenuation passing through foliage.

1
1

[–] Lavender7 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Is there clothing that can shield you from 5g waves?