0
11

[–] 16964767? 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Not true. Twitter is taxpayer funded, and is a front company for the CIA. Same with facebook, amazon, youtube, and others.

4
-3

[–] 16965316? [S] 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

Hahahahahhahahahahahah

4
-3

[–] 16965317? [S] 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

Hahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahaha

0
0

[–] 16971774? ago 

Go back to reddit, faggot.

0
2

[–] 16964782? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

/\ THIS!!!

0
4

[–] 16965113? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Twitter are a platform, not a publisher. If they control what they allow on their platform, then they are a publisher. There are different laws for platforms and publishers ... "publishers" can be sued for what appears on their service, platforms are protected under fair use. Twitter is trying to be both ... they are publishers while trying to hide behind the protection of platforms.

Although based on your immature and low IQ attempt at trolling ... I doubt you care. Stay patient ... that pubic hair will kick in any day now.

4
-4

0
4

[–] 16964936? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

An argument can be made that it is a public utility and equal access should be provided for all. As widespread as the social media platforms have become and the fact that they are major forms of communication look for them to be regulated the same way television, telephone, newspaper, radio etc have been. These aren’t just “some company”- they’ve transcended that in terms of importance in today’s society.

3
-3

[–] 16965417? [S] 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

If Fox or ABC wants to ban you from their channel, then they should be able to. If you wanna go onto public access TV, go for it, but you don’t have the right to express yourself on something simply because it’s nationally accessible

0
2

[–] 16965711? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

But they can’t. They must run advertisements for any political candidate that wants to use their airwaves. They must provide equal access at equal prices. They are not permitted to discriminate based on political affiliation. Same with radio. Same with newspapers. Social media has become just as widespread and the same rules are coming for them, guaranteed.

0
0

[–] 16968105? ago 

ABC banned my disqus account after only one comment.

0
1

[–] 16966064? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Spread this.

In 1776 the Public Forum was 100% owned by the government. Becuase of this the 1st Amendment was created to avoid the dangers of such a monopoly.

In 2019, the Public Forum is owned by Internet Companies. (60% owned by Faceboom). We need 1st Amendment protections against the FB monopoly.

0
4

[–] 16965466? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Sorry but Twittter is funded through DARPA and the CIA. Just like Amazon. TAXPAYERS fund TWITTER. Now the deep state doesnt like what we say. Sorry. Tax payers funded therefore we have a right to use this public utility

2
-1

[–] 16964677? 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Agreed.

Twitter banning anyone they like is no different to a Christian baker refusing to make sodomy-cakes.

The people who own Twitter have a constitutional right to express their political bias in the same way as you and I.

If people don't want to get banned from a platform then they shouldn't use platforms that are addicted to censorship.

0
4

[–] 16964886? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Nope, they're currently trying to have their cake and eat it too. They have certain (((protections))) in place because of their (((Status))) in legalese. They are by no fucking means a (((Private))) Company any more than (((Facebook)))(But sure, I'm sure it's TOTALLY coincidence that DARPA drops the project that sounds SUSPICIOUSLY LIKE FACEBOOK the same fucking day that facebook was allegedly (((Founded))).)

They are no longer a (((Private))) anything, they have the power to alter the world by use of consensus cracking. Much like the Nuclear Bomb, Twitter and Social media shouldn't fucking exist. Most of you lot are too god damn childish to understand what power it possesses. It's up there with the Hydrogen Bomb and Birth Control but we treat it like it's just a ballpoint pen or something.

Sad.

3
-3

[–] 16965623? [S] 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE MAH FREE SPEEECH REEEEEEEEEEEE

0
2

[–] 16965041? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Oh THANK YOU. You know what you are talking about. MOST are just kids. I know some 70 year old kids. Dumm as a bag of rocks.

0
0

[–] 16965077? ago 

Yes BUT not with our money...

0
3

[–] 16964842? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Stop using Twit. It’s primarily Liberals who hate conservatives and you will never convert them anyway. Delete your accounts. Drop Twit’s user engagement numbers which will freak stock holders who will eventually sell their shares. There is your plan. It’s that simple.

0
2

[–] 16965155? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

There is an implied contract between twitter and the user. Twitter is providing a service, and the user pays for that service by giving up privacy. Twitter profits off of this arrangement. I think it can be argued that Twitter shouldn't be selectively discriminating against a group of people based on political affiliation or anything else. I would like to see this argued in court. I think Twitter would lose.

4
-4

0
2

[–] 16965706? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

OP is an asshole.

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)