[–]16965155?0 points
2 points
2 points
(+2|-0)
ago
There is an implied contract between twitter and the user. Twitter is providing a service, and the user pays for that service by giving up privacy. Twitter profits off of this arrangement. I think it can be argued that Twitter shouldn't be selectively discriminating against a group of people based on political affiliation or anything else. I would like to see this argued in court. I think Twitter would lose.
[–]16965466?0 points
4 points
4 points
(+4|-0)
ago
Sorry but Twittter is funded through DARPA and the CIA. Just like Amazon. TAXPAYERS fund TWITTER. Now the deep state doesnt like what we say. Sorry. Tax payers funded therefore we have a right to use this public utility
[–] 16965155? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
There is an implied contract between twitter and the user. Twitter is providing a service, and the user pays for that service by giving up privacy. Twitter profits off of this arrangement. I think it can be argued that Twitter shouldn't be selectively discriminating against a group of people based on political affiliation or anything else. I would like to see this argued in court. I think Twitter would lose.