People who were paranoid of government were approached with bribes if they would do horrible, horrible things…
Or were they?
I have as much evidence as anyone in PG has.
All any of you actually have is causality conjectures, and most of you are dreadful at it. Pictures are not persuasive.
The Obama administration wanted to take down child abuse.
They
made
mistakes
and
punished
their
victims.
I actually tried that. It was legitimately fun! It also proved nothing to me. I am not a financial crimes expert, and I am not the kind of moron who thinks everything dug for is found. Just because I went proves nothing. What I learned by tracing money flows - the only real peculiarity is I found a non-farmer taking agriculture subsidies. I doubt there was anything illegal about that, and it didn’t involve large sums. What I learned is chiefly that I am not a financial crimes expert.
Other people are. Many of them very dearly want society to have trust and rationality. If this was real, those people would expose it.
"Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans Health? Lessons Spanning Half A Century", part F. Hallucinogens Archived 2006-08-13 at the Wayback Machine Archived 2006-08-13 at the Wayback Machine 103rd Congress, 2nd Session-S. Prt. 103-97; Staff Report prepared for the committee on veterans' affairs December 8, 1994 John D. Rockefeller IV, West Virginia, Chairman. Online copy provided by gulfweb.org, which describes itself as "Serving the Gulf War Veteran Community Worldwide Since 1994". (The same document is available from many other (unofficial) sites, which may or may not be independent.)
[–] 17338363? ago
Be willing to accept apology, and willing to offer it. Anger is not charismatic.
One of the big reasons I remain intensely skeptical of government surveillance is that what happens out of sight cannot have its errors amended, and visible surveillance regimes are not very effective. It is something less than law as expressed by courts; there is room for arrogance to loop and reinforce itself.