0
0

[–] Civil_Warrior ago 

It was don't be evil

More like Stop being a nigger for the Jews.

0
0

[–] Drunkenst ago 

Nikola Tesla said wha to his secretary?

0
0

[–] TH0UGHTP0LICE ago 

"Nice tits"

0
0

[–] Drunkenst ago  (edited ago)

Bingo! You win a πŸͺ. Seems to me I read he said sumtin else too.

0
1

[–] Secret555 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I mentioned this a couple of times before on Voat but I will repeat it again to prove how long their agenda of complete data collection has been going on for. About 7 years ago I was one of the leads in a startup who was developing a fitbit type of wearable specifically for dogs. Our startup was next to Google headquarters in Canada and it was quite often that Google would "assist" or sponsor startups they found in the incubator we were located in. They were very interested in our product and we had many meetings with their developers and even so far as their Canadian president. They wanted us to incorporate a microphone into our product without any use to our service. They kept insisting that although we wouldn't require it at the time that by implementing it into the finalised design we could maybe make use of it at a later time.

Also, it is important to note that they were really interested in our product not for the many reasins we were developing it but to get an accurate description of the floor plans of residential units. Since we would incorporate altimeters and several other sensors and the unit would be continuously streaming they could not only get the general floor plan but since animals have a tendency to jump on furniture or counters they could recognize furniture layouts and other diverse dimensional traits. The president stated quite clearly in a meeting "People are habitual and tend to follow similar patterns in a space but an animal has a tendency to cover more area and display a randomness that will lead us to have a more accurate representation of the space." Their push was to make Google Streetview more accurate by offering interior dimensions and design. This shit has been going on for a long time. As a team we had to seriously understand and discuss their partnership. We were generally creeped out and decided to not partake in their offers to help us develop the product. It probably cost us but we felt it was the ethical decision. Needless to say they dropped us like a sack of retarded kittens. I despise Google and try my hardest to limit their influence in my life since that time.

0
1

[–] stonewallphysics 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Next question, what else are these fuckers up to?

0
3

[–] Phuc_Dat_Bich 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

He’s a street-shitter, not a shitskin.

0
3

[–] EngineeringReverse 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Google needs to be taken down.

1
-1

[–] Ghetto_Shitlord 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

For? What laws are at play here?

0
3

[–] AlternateSelection 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Yes they did make an "error". They got caught. That was their error. Is anybody honest anymore? Is it too damn hard to do the right thing?

0
5

[–] derram 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

https://archive.ph/6FCVV :

2019-02-19 | Google says Nest microphone was 'never supposed to be a secret' - Business Insider

"The problem: Nest users didn't know a microphone even existed on their security device to begin with."

'In early February, Google announced that its home security and alarm system Nest Secure would be getting an update β€” users could now enable its virtual assistant technology, Google Assistant. '

'Google bought Nest β€” which was initially known for its smart thermostat device β€” back in 2014 for $3.2 billion. '

'On Tuesday, a Google spokesperson told Business Insider the company had made an "error."'

'The existence of a microphone on the Nest Guard (which is the alarm, keypad, and motion sensor component in the Nest Secure offering) was never disclosed in any of the product material for the device. '


This has been an automated message.

1
10

[–] Gorillion 1 point 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

Reminder. Google is owned and funded by the CIA via their Alphabet umbrella company.

0
0

[–] Tranix ago 

Source?

0
3

[–] LeviGoldstein 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

For the CIA, Google was an investment in the future of the US. The above is obviously a simple oversight; I don't know what the fuss is about. There is no coincidence here.

load more comments ▼ (7 remaining)