0
0

[–] 16856989? ago 

It doesn’t really matter, does it? Normalfags don’t care and never have. We have no power and can’t get it because jews have total information control. We can’t even organize because any group of more than three of us is a guaranteed honeypot. Most of the last century of history has been completely fabricated. What are you going to do about it?

0
0

[–] 16856990? ago 

This is a jewish disinformation, and Simon Shack is a dirty kike.

0
0

[–] 16856994? ago 

"Simon Shack" is indeed a jew disinformationist, if he is even a real person, but you seem to be attempting to discredit the concept I've put forth via poisoning by association.

>>12816853

glowniggers

fashwave

You smell like gefilte fish. Even if there are changes in the photos, they are very small. Why aren't there larger changes, like the face/head being turned at a different angle, no smile, a larger smile, a side shot, etc? Some ARE identical, like notable "Steven Coakley" @3:30.

>>12816843

Most of the last century of history has been completely fabricated.

Actually I think most of history has been fabricated. And I really do not know what to do about it.

0
0

[–] 16856995? ago 

It takes a high level of functioning schizophrenia to post like you do. As well as live under the assumption that even real people may not "exist" holy shit.

0
0

[–] 16858358? ago 

12816843

Most of the last century of history has been completely fabricated.

Actually I think most of history has been fabricated. And I really do not know what to do about it.

Same. You're the only other being I've come across with this idea.

0
0

[–] 16856991? ago 

Okay in almost each of the first photos shown in the 1:44 I made it through this garbage, noticeable differences are in each image. Also how fucking autistic are you that you think people can't make the same facial expressions with their own fucking faces?

Take this faggotry to >>>/x/

0
0

[–] 16857030? ago 

bro every picture of every person must be the same all the time or else its fake. i never look different depending on angle or smile or lighting.

0
0

[–] 16857001? ago 

Seems like this could be relevant to

White Victims of Black Crime threat

0
0

[–] 16857011? ago 

There's no evidence here that these are fake. It's common for people to develop go-to photo-poses to avoid looking awkward. The lighting is clearly different in these pairs. There are slight differences in angle. There is clearly no cloning. Yawn.

0
1

[–] 16857012? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Current deepfake or A.I generated people are comprised of different element of pictures of a single person, or amalgamated from hundreds of thousands of pictures of real people. An A.I created face is not drawn from thin air, it is extrapolated and generated from a database. Generated faces have issues with incorperated hair and background. Eyes often show corrupted information. The four quadrants of the face do not have matching planes. The chin and jawline are unsymmetrical with the neck or appear to be blended directly into the neck. The background must be simple or obscured and is limited to how many people can appear in the image. This is improving quickly.

A quick study of the faces the website provides will demonstrate an overall cartoonish aspect to the faces as the elements of the face do not quite face the correct directions.

0
0

[–] 16857013? ago 

I used the word face quite often in my last sentence, I was eating and not paying attention to how I type. Ignore how silly it sounds.

0
0

[–] 16857017? ago 

Yes, I should have clarified that I do not think AI made the fake photos for 9/11, but rather is was done by ((("humans"))) working with some Photoshop type software (maybe even Photoshop itself),

0
1

[–] 16857021? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Photoshop expertise is not to be dismissed at all in the faking of evidence or visual 'proof'. Numerous methods of tricking the eye using even old technology are utilized constantly. Green screens now create a near impossible to distinguish background, for example.

0
0

[–] 16875970? ago 

The real limitation is that its not able to infer relational information of how shapes, textures and pose are associated to higher level concepts of what define faces.

It's only learning probabilities of where features are located and what variations are tolerated based on the training data set. Tell it to generate a face beyond what its data set features enough examples of and it'll fuck up catastrophically. The glitches in this are more likely cases where the AI inferred two or more similar properties of a feature and attempted to morph them together, without understanding concepts which define how said properties should relate.

0
0

[–] 16857018? ago 

Looks like that the guy from Ash vs. Evil Dead, but he gained weight.

0
1

[–] 16857027? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/

WOW. The future is gonna be fucked my dudes. Imagine people getting framed for crimes like this.

load more comments ▼ (19 remaining)