0
0

[–] 16857280? ago 

0
0

[–] 16857031? ago 

The simulation is running out of iterations without more mixing. Soon every identity from the beginning to the end will be established and the simulation can be reset.

0
0

[–] 16857029? ago 

Probably what they use to conjure up people who never existed that were "victims" of a (((shooting))).

0
1

[–] 16857027? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/

WOW. The future is gonna be fucked my dudes. Imagine people getting framed for crimes like this.

0
0

[–] 16857018? ago 

Looks like that the guy from Ash vs. Evil Dead, but he gained weight.

0
1

[–] 16857012? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Current deepfake or A.I generated people are comprised of different element of pictures of a single person, or amalgamated from hundreds of thousands of pictures of real people. An A.I created face is not drawn from thin air, it is extrapolated and generated from a database. Generated faces have issues with incorperated hair and background. Eyes often show corrupted information. The four quadrants of the face do not have matching planes. The chin and jawline are unsymmetrical with the neck or appear to be blended directly into the neck. The background must be simple or obscured and is limited to how many people can appear in the image. This is improving quickly.

A quick study of the faces the website provides will demonstrate an overall cartoonish aspect to the faces as the elements of the face do not quite face the correct directions.

0
0

[–] 16875970? ago 

The real limitation is that its not able to infer relational information of how shapes, textures and pose are associated to higher level concepts of what define faces.

It's only learning probabilities of where features are located and what variations are tolerated based on the training data set. Tell it to generate a face beyond what its data set features enough examples of and it'll fuck up catastrophically. The glitches in this are more likely cases where the AI inferred two or more similar properties of a feature and attempted to morph them together, without understanding concepts which define how said properties should relate.

0
0

[–] 16857017? ago 

Yes, I should have clarified that I do not think AI made the fake photos for 9/11, but rather is was done by ((("humans"))) working with some Photoshop type software (maybe even Photoshop itself),

0
1

[–] 16857021? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Photoshop expertise is not to be dismissed at all in the faking of evidence or visual 'proof'. Numerous methods of tricking the eye using even old technology are utilized constantly. Green screens now create a near impossible to distinguish background, for example.

0
0

[–] 16857013? ago 

I used the word face quite often in my last sentence, I was eating and not paying attention to how I type. Ignore how silly it sounds.

0
0

[–] 16857011? ago 

There's no evidence here that these are fake. It's common for people to develop go-to photo-poses to avoid looking awkward. The lighting is clearly different in these pairs. There are slight differences in angle. There is clearly no cloning. Yawn.

0
0

[–] 16857001? ago 

Seems like this could be relevant to

White Victims of Black Crime threat

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)