Ear from another pic without the different background fully cropped out. hat all messed up. partial second face completely distorted again.
Another one with messed up ears.
Cross eyed dude with weird rainbow colored "burn" on his beard.
Another rainbow colored "burn" on the ear, & weird lookings thing by his chin. Looks like it's supposed to be a microphone, but seems to be a piece of leather, & possibly some teeth on the top boarder?
Also seems to have trouble with kids faces. Just don't looks right. It blends other objects together that shouldn't be. Mouth is deformed, eyebrows are wrong, ears still a problem.
"Simon Shack" is indeed a jew disinformationist, if he is even a real person, but you seem to be attempting to discredit the concept I've put forth via poisoning by association.
glowniggers
fashwave
You smell like gefilte fish. Even if there are changes in the photos, they are very small. Why aren't there larger changes, like the face/head being turned at a different angle, no smile, a larger smile, a side shot, etc? Some ARE identical, like notable "Steven Coakley" @3:30.
Most of the last century of history has been completely fabricated.
Actually I think most of history has been fabricated. And I really do not know what to do about it.
[–] 16857012? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Current deepfake or A.I generated people are comprised of different element of pictures of a single person, or amalgamated from hundreds of thousands of pictures of real people. An A.I created face is not drawn from thin air, it is extrapolated and generated from a database. Generated faces have issues with incorperated hair and background. Eyes often show corrupted information. The four quadrants of the face do not have matching planes. The chin and jawline are unsymmetrical with the neck or appear to be blended directly into the neck. The background must be simple or obscured and is limited to how many people can appear in the image. This is improving quickly.
A quick study of the faces the website provides will demonstrate an overall cartoonish aspect to the faces as the elements of the face do not quite face the correct directions.
[–] 16875970? ago
The real limitation is that its not able to infer relational information of how shapes, textures and pose are associated to higher level concepts of what define faces.
It's only learning probabilities of where features are located and what variations are tolerated based on the training data set. Tell it to generate a face beyond what its data set features enough examples of and it'll fuck up catastrophically. The glitches in this are more likely cases where the AI inferred two or more similar properties of a feature and attempted to morph them together, without understanding concepts which define how said properties should relate.
[–] 16857017? ago
Yes, I should have clarified that I do not think AI made the fake photos for 9/11, but rather is was done by ((("humans"))) working with some Photoshop type software (maybe even Photoshop itself),
[–] 16857021? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Photoshop expertise is not to be dismissed at all in the faking of evidence or visual 'proof'. Numerous methods of tricking the eye using even old technology are utilized constantly. Green screens now create a near impossible to distinguish background, for example.
[–] 16857013? ago
I used the word face quite often in my last sentence, I was eating and not paying attention to how I type. Ignore how silly it sounds.