[–] Crikes 0 points 11 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago (edited ago)
When people say "People shouldn't fear the government. Government should fear the people.", this is the inevitable result.
Government shouldn't fear people any more than toasters should fear people.
If government is large and sophisticated enough to be self aware, it was allowed to grow too big. It should never have gotten that size. Now you have to revolt and start over with something less corruptible.
Everything that can be corrupted will be corrupted.
[–] Muh-Shugana 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
The very phrase "government should fear the people" implys that the people in the gov are still not the same as the people being governed.
It assumes that the government is to remain manned totally by foreigners, just ones that fear us!
IT IMPLYS THAT WE ARE STILL NOT ALLOWED TO GOVERN OURSELVES.
Everything that can be corrupted will be corrupted.
Don't give the jews the compliment of omnipotence, they couldn't corrupt the german government so they had no choice but to declare war and destroy them the slow way. That alone shows that it's possible to at least resist corruption.
[–] Crikes 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Don't give the jews the compliment of omnipotence, they couldn't corrupt the german government so they had no choice but to declare war and destroy them the slow way. That alone shows that it's possible to at least resist corruption.
It's possible that Germany was opting out of global corruption in favor of their own local one. The owners of the world corrupted everything else, and committed genocide against them.
They used a nation founded on principles that should have kept them out of such conflicts, had them smash Germany twice, and then celebrate it.
Consider the extent in which the founding fathers attempted to make a minarchist government that wouldn't be corrupted. The warnings they gave, that we were encouraged to ignore. To this day 95% of us don't realize what our founding fathers assumed would be our birthright wisdom; liberty is the answer.
The more centralized, the more corruptible.
There are decentralized organizations. There are non-hierarchical organizations.
There is new technology, as of 2009, that is less corruptible than anything we've ever had before.
Don't disregard this truth;
Anything that can be corrupted will be corrupted.
The least corruptible was the individual. Now there are even less corruptible options.
Never stop looking for less corruptible options.
One thing is certain, government as we know it is a scam, and doesn't work. It is the disease posing as the cure.
[–] CrudOMatic 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Everything that can be
corruptedJewed will becorruptedJewed.
FTFY.
[–] shadow332 6 points -3 points 3 points (+3|-6) ago (edited ago)
I recognized that symbol immediately. That's why there's a third way (dritte weg) to go, hence the III:
[–] Trousersnake1488 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
A new face!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DAqS7snNg8
[–] captainstrange 5 points -1 points 4 points (+4|-5) ago
The term "Third Position" was coined in Europe and the main precursors of Third Position politics were National Bolshevism (a synthesis of far-right ultranationalism and far-left Bolshevik socialism)
Gonna have to pass on that.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] captainstrange ago (edited ago)
Someone mentioned third position politics. I called out bolshevism because I call it as I see it.
Edit: Was responding to someone talking about the subject, not to the III.
[–] PurityAndHonor 2 points 3 points 5 points (+5|-2) ago
This might be the greatest simple statement of all time.
And whatever @NaziTranny said, faggotry.
[–] Niggerfaggotjewkike 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
When you get a tattoo of a fake internet militia, you are a RETARD.
[–] Armpit_and_Ass 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
At first, I thought the title was There is a tranny, and nothing made any sense.
Coffee. Must. Have. Coffee.... Can't.... hold on... any longer.
[–] Anonymous171717 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
You can't spell tyranny withou tranny. Makes sense...
[–] [deleted] 5 points 9 points 14 points (+14|-5) ago (edited ago)
[–] Here_Comma_Suk_Dd 5 points -3 points 2 points (+2|-5) ago
This is classic. People who want war the most have no clue on how to properly fight one. The goal is to subdue your enemy without force. Not hunt for bloodlust. Your strategy is a losing one.
[–] Hey_Sunshine 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
And when faced with annihilation what will you do?
[–] 16840382? 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Valhalla!