[–] 16807861? 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1.8 years ago
Technicolor-b
[–] 16808212? 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) 1.8 years ago
Why does that surprise you? Professional quality photography of 70 years ago was way better quality than consumer snap shots from 30 years ago.
[–] 16808884? 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1.8 years ago
I was going to say that but this writer is too stupid to get it.
[–] 16808300? 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) 1.8 years ago
This is the dumbest post I've seen today and that's really saying something.
[–] 16808558? 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1.8 years ago
Emulsion ftw
[–] 16808600? 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1.8 years ago
The were using a fine grain B/W film like Kodak Tri-X- Pan ASA 25 ultra fine grain B/W film. Incredibly fine detail and range of contrast when properly exposed.
[–] 16808815? 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1.8 years ago
Camera tech was completely different then. Digital CCDs and pixels weren't a thing until the late 60s.
[–] 16822834? 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1.8 years ago
There was no digital photography in the 60s. More like the 1990s.
[–] 16808863? 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1.8 years ago
You CLEARLY do not know what you are talking about.
[–] 16808878? 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1.8 years ago
Old school movies were shot on film that is like 30k resolution... compared to the barely 4k you can get today in digital.
Old film was much higher res.
[–] 16807861? ago
Technicolor-b