0
0

[–] 16932063? ago 

No doubt the Jews did serve demons, false gods like many of the nations around them had. Over and over they committed adultery and whored themselves out to them. They were disciplined over and over again, chastised, enslaved, burned, and killed for their rebellious ways. Did their false and demonic gods do this? No, the God that created and sustains all things did it, the just God who will not allow rebellion to go unpunished.

So yeah, you are right to say the Jews obeyed a demon rather than God but what is new? Many today serve that same god all while hating the jew, their brothers in their faith of apostasy.

0
0

[–] 16932070? ago 

And the same "God" (((YHWH))) is also depicted murdering White babies in Egypt in order to save those vile jews. Not only are you defending such a morally repugnant anti-White entity, but the fact that Exodus didn't happen means yet still managed to get into (((YHWH)))'s holy books means your god is a deceiver god.

0
0

[–] 16932075? ago 

You reason like a jew… not surprising if you know what I mean ;-)

Pharoah served a false god and even thought of himself as god. He was serving the same gods the Jews did at the base of mount Sinai. Take a look at what happened to them.

God is merciful! He gave ignorant and prideful pharaoh warning after warning as He repeatedly called for him to let the Jews go (God had a plan for them). After 9 warnings, plagues, and miracles God struck the first born dead. Pharoah, like many Jews, and like many men today face rebuke after rebuke to only resist God and keep serving demons.

Who do you serve?

0
0

[–] 16930568? ago 

You think I don't know the difference, fag? Gobekli Tepe's absolute youngest age estimate go back to the 10th millennium BC. Go ahead and try to negotiate that down to 1,000 years.

I do think you don't know the difference as you mentioned the vedic texts which are from ~1,200BC. They are indisputable evidence of civilisation.

As fascinating as Gobekli Tepe is, there's no evidence to show who built it, nor does it imply civilisation as we know it in the form of cities with literacy and the like. As such it does not dispute the Biblical account in a way that the Vedic Texts being older than 6,000 years would.

And that's not factoring in the unreliability of carbon dating or potential lying from archaeologists and scientists who want to make some money.

0
0

[–] 16932065? ago 

Vedic texts

only 3,000 years old

You are outright denying reality at this point. Why the fuck are you defending the Adam and Eve myth if you already admitted such tales as Noah's Flood are bullshit?