0
0

[–] 16924756? ago 

using logic to interpret evidence to reach a known conclusion is retarded

Kill yourself.

You're saying is akin to "We know that water became ice, and we know that when we put water in regions in cold temperatures it transitions to ice; but why should we interpret that as meaning that cold temperature turns water into ice? Why could we not interpret it as anything else? Perhaps invisible elves are attracted to cold places, and invisible elves like to turn water into ice; thus we need the cold places to attract the invisible elves who then turn the water into ice. You don't know for certain that it is the cold temperature and not the invisible elf, stop acting like you know how reality works."

0
0

[–] 16927068? ago 

You are not using logic, you are your own fucking bias in order to interpret it.

The bible said the universe was created in 6 days? And it didn't say Adam is white.

You're saying is akin to "We know that water became ice, and we know that when we put water in regions in cold temperatures it transitions to ice; but why should we interpret that as meaning that cold temperature turns water into ice?

Because causation does not equal correlation.