1
3

[–] 16685223? 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

[-30] kind of implies that mueller finished a month ago.

0
1

[–] 16686156? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

No it means it will be finished 30 days or less

0
0

[–] 16686178? ago 

that would be [30].

0
0

[–] 16693244? ago 

If there’s something happening in the future, the proper phrase would be “T-x” with x being the days left until d-day so to speak. The minus sign means it’s yet to come. A plus sign before the number would infer that it’s already happened.

0
0

[–] 16699643? ago 

I would agree with this if Q hadn't used [30] before in previous posts to signify positive delta time.

This is the first time ive seen [-30] in his posts.

0
3

[–] 16683347? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Please shutdown, and never resume, the superfluous government overreach/makework. Give us at least a year without having to fund our own invasion.

1
3

[–] 16682749? 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Missed ya Q. I like it when you troll the DS.

0
2

[–] 16686609? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

How are they preparing to combat [narrative = vital]?

House intel launch of more 'FAKE' investigations in attempt to retain 'FALSE NARRATIVE' and claim 'POLITICAL ATTACK(S)' if investigated/prosecuted themselves?

[AS]?

[SDNY-AG]?

Attempts to retain 'BLOCKADE'?

Attempts to prevent public release of the TRUTH?

Q is implying that the left is planning to pivot to a new investigation of some kind, as soon as the Mueller probe flops. They want to keep negative optics against the POTUS, thinking that they can limit him from investigating their swamp.

To do this, they need to be able to hide behind the false claim of "obstruction of 'justice,'" in hopes of stopping the investigations against them. Therefore, expect some kind of new bullshit claim, and calls for new special prosecutor nonsense, likely surrounding something involving the SDNY attorney general.

0
1

[–] 16688921? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

They already have. The SDNY subpoenaed Trumps inauguration records. This isn't gonna end well for them. The guy they are targetting is the former co chair of Obama's election finance effort. He donated millions to Hillary & Obama. So this guy also gave Trump money as soon as he was elected -- as a setup to smear Trump with the same dirty paint brush

This is going to boomerang on the dems. The SDNY AG supported Trump's election. That's why Q mention it in this post.

0
1

[–] 16687634? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

To do this, Dems need to retain the House. When DECLAS comes, it all goes away. Trump got them to show their butts again!

0
0

[–] 16693212? ago 

They aren’t pivoting at all. They have majority in the house now and they r gonna stay on the Russia Russia Russia crap. So that when mueller is done the house will still have some ancillary things going still, leaving a stench over the presidency. These ppl r sick.

1
2

[–] 16683196? 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

BOOOOOOOOOM!!!

0
0

[–] 16685686? ago 

As clear and crisp as a Michigan winter morn. Sky's clear, see forever. Deep blue and endless.

2
2

[–] 16681852? 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

1
0

[–] 16683291? [S] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

So? Many of us knew it. But not everyone seeks the data out. Q fills in the story for those who need it.

3
-1

[–] 16685274? 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

No. He releases cryptic information that makes it seem like he has inside information but if fact it's just regurgitated news stories, speculation and bullshit. Why would he phrase it like this >Probe conclusion coming?

[-30]

instead of just actually telling us what the news story was?

0
1

[–] 16685739? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

May the quiet mission hold. Silence is golden. Gold is the reward. The gold of true freedom. May the sword of truth defend us from what has beseached us.

0
1

[–] 16684889? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

bomberS? Plural? This again mashes me wonder if not only is Mueller a gray hat, who will suddenly exonerate Trump and indict (in a non-legal sense) O, Hillary and others j but also that they are others (Schumer?) who will suddenly emerge as hidden Trump assets. Imagine if that private meeting with the NY Times editor, as well as someone like Brazile suddenly came out against the cabal.....

0
0

[–] 16687809? [S] ago 

He's referring to Sessions, Huber, and Whitaker

load more comments ▼ (10 remaining)