[–] jakov 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Smells right.....= it makes sense...................Thanks for your time and effort......Helps us perform those 'leaps'. God speed to us all and POTUS.......The Nissi-Banner is being raised.....The Beloveds gather.......Babies will be saved.....and so shall we........Thanks and Praise to God. Amen.
[–] Sutie 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Brilliant explanation of the series of events at the SOTU ...I noticed NP looking thru her booklet a lot and thought maybe POTUS switched her booklet so that she couldn’t follow along and see his speech or guests.... Anyways loved the interpretation....🇺🇸🇺🇸👍👍❤️❤️😊😊
[–] SerialBrain2 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yes, Nancy found a way to dodge the bombs with paperwork... :)
[–] divine_human 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
the neckless thing doesnt sit well with me. NP may have sent a signal to her d'rats or just been uncomfortable with the necklace. but hey, i keep it open and watch what happens until feb.15 ;)
[–] ArielQflip 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
LOL, I just thought it was funny WETBrain Pelosi had two red balls on her neck! Insightful SB, lets take action as I am personally tired of the analysis regarding disclosure of the Look here, Not here bullshit.
[–] Fishdo169 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Thanks SB...
As you pointed out you can clearly see the tie movement was perfectly natural due to the twisting moves by POTUS to shake hands with both sides of the aisle...
But I’m not convinced about Pelosi and the necklace, if you assume it was a sign then it could easily have been a signal to other democrats and/or to persons watching... I’m more likely to believe that if it was some sort of signal then it wasn’t given to POTUS, who had his back to her and there would be no need to make such a signal at that point of the speech which is why if it was a signal then I don’t believe it was to POTUS....
But just like the tie becoming crooked being a natural consequence of movement by POTUS I also think the necklace was as well, I say that from my own experience with my wife and other women I know and how they move their necklaces for a number of reasons but the most common reason for them making their necklace slightly off centre is that they don’t have a mirror and they misjudge the centre because of the weight being pretty equal around the front or bottom of a large necklace.... of course other reasons include irritation from rubbing and/or sweat or trying to do it quickly so it isn’t really noticed that your fidgety...
It that common experience I have that leads me to think you’ve drawn a pretty big conclusion without any real substantiation....
But I do as always appreciate your efforts and your insights...
[–] SerialBrain2 [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
But just like the tie becoming crooked being a natural consequence of movement by POTUS I also think the necklace was as well,
Thank you for your good comment. Did you watch the video? Here are the screen shots: Img6. Nancy displaced her necklace with her own hands, purposely. And after this displacement, it went to the right when its natural position is to be centered.
Thanks mate... yes I’ve watched it a few times and I really don’t disagree with your conclusion but having watched my wife do exactly the same sort of motions either because she thought the necklace wasn’t centred or it had irritated her so she moves but tries to put it back in centre or sometimes because she gets hot and the centre piece keeps irritating her...
All I was trying to say was I couldn’t see anything in those frames that could decide it one way or another...
And like I also mentioned if it was a signal then I would still think the balance of probabilities is that it was to signal person or persons in the house or watching rather than a signal to DJT.... and I only say that because of when she did it and that when she did move it DJT couldn’t have seen it being deliberately done...
As with so much we see and hear and as you have pointed out so well since our beginning there are many layers.... but for me I just cannot see anything to substantiate one possibility from another regarding the necklace....
Personally I’d much rather have seen our POTUS turn around and strangle her with that damn necklace... or even his tie...!! 😉😂
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
[–] Fateswebb 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
I didn't think of the necklace as a sign to Donald, but more as a sign to her cronies..
Like are we playing ball, or shutting out.i see it as maybe legit. Also I noticed she would shuffle papers and her cronies wouldn't clap for the point the POTUS Made. I don't see that as far fetched that she was sending signals to her cronies to make sure everyone was on the same page with their responses.
[–] derram 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
https://invidio.us/watch?v=TXep_uf-ESY): :
404 Not Found
https://invidio.us/watch?v=TXep_uf-ESY :
Trump's 2019 State of the Union address | Full Speech - YouTube
https://files.catbox.moe/8nna0d.png :
Inside China's audacious global propaganda campaign | News | The Guardian
https://invidio.us/watch?v=h06PZp-Bk3A :
Sarah Sanders: Roger Stone's arrest has nothing to do with President Trump - YouTube
https://invidio.us/watch?v=S7kS5arRoVY :
Chinese Ambassador With Chris Wallace 10 14 18 - YouTube
[–] Ocean_Cruiser 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Great explanation sb2 - Thank you. I continually check for your latest analysis, this old man is slowly learning.