I'm going to laugh so fucking hard if Trump loses in 2020 and all this "Trump loves kikes" posting suddenly stops. It wouldn't be the first time certain types of posts here suddenly stopped after a major event. This place is getting played hard, sorry for you fags that fall for it. But whoever replaces Trump is going to be 10 tens the kike lover Trump is, at least.
Trump is going to be 10 tens the kike lover Trump is.
I am not sure. Trump realy love kikes. More than white americans. Trump love Israel more than America. Yes he didn't removed Assad. But he is not realy useful. Does it matter if president send 35, 38 or 42 billions to Israel? No wall. No deportation. As last white president he realy didn't do much.
This is why anonymous image board can actually be very hazardous, because, well, its amazing how many people at this stage are suddenly coming forth and proclaiming how they knew it all along and anyone who didn't was a fool.
Yet, if you were here during the election, it was RIFE with support for Trump - and plenty of (regularly banned) opposition. Due to the anonymous nature of the board, and the ubiquity of proxys/VPNs/equivalent services, its really not very hard for a small group of people to give the impression that they are much larger in size as a group.
4 men with 4 IP's each to work from can thusly appear as 16 people, and in a thread, that can and does go a long way towards creating false consensus. I suspect some in this very thread know all about that technique.
In any case, the board was full of people proclaiming support for Trump, whether they were legitimate or not, so it seems probable you were one of those people and are now pretending you were not.
If you're going to be a fag butthurt that Trumpstein betrayed you, fine, but don't lump me in with you. I skipped out on most of 2016 because this place had gotten so terrible already before the primaries had begun and the alt /pol/s had died, thanks to the turkroach and his newfag cultists calling them goon and /intl/ boards and the handful of people who used them coming back here whenever kampfy stopped robotripping for a week.
Never fails to amuse me how after 2016 this place has filled to the brim with those anonymously calling for action who will never actually do anything themselves. They always want someone else to go first so they can feel safety in numbers, and will level the harshest criticism at those who propose anything other than total "GAS THE KIKES/RACE WAR NOW" actions.
Never fails to amuse me how after 2016 this place has filled to the brim with those anonymously calling for action who will never actually do anything themselves.
What does that mean though? People can't do it 'themselves', the people must do it as a group, or it accomplishes nothing.
They always want someone else to go first so they can feel safety in numbers
You're saying "They require a leader to spur them to action", and yes, that's a common trait of the European people, and others in turn. People follow leaders. They rarely just come together out of the ether to do a thing together without any ties being made or any leadership or direction.
I'd be happy to follow a good leader, they just don't seem to be able to rise to any position of prominence in my country's system of politics.
and will level the harshest criticism at those who propose anything other than total "GAS THE KIKES/RACE WAR NOW" actions.
I keep hearing this narrative, but most of the harsh criticisms are levied on those who are, ya know, married to jews, or secretly gay, etc etc etc.
Again, I'd be happy to follow a good leader, but so far the only things coming out presenting themselves even-vaguely in-line with what is needed are people who quickly turn out to be wildly subpar.
Tell me: Who do you think has come forward in this capacity that you feel was unjustly criticized?
Cowardice in its purest form.
There is a fine line between cowardice and self-preservation, between courage and stupidity. You're seemingly denying that.
jobs for welfare queens instead of gibs
<implying implications
what have YOU done using violence
<because violence never worked ever goy
whats your alternative to this cuckolded system that is also extant within the context of this cuckolded system?
<oh you say its all kosher and must die? i'll ignore that answer
my post was well thought out
<no it wasn't, it was just more of you shilling
oy vey you cant compete with my logic!
meme answer
still did nothing
no plan
meme answer
Good job schlomo, you proved my point.
Don't want gibs? Make 'em work. You want violence? Fine, you go first, set an example. Don't like Trump? Promote another candidate, or don't vote and let other people choose for you. Wanna burn down the government? Again, you go first, set an example. Don't have anything to say but memepost blackpilling? STFU then.
My answer just copied yours in mockery. If mine is a 'meme answers, so is yours.
still did nothing
<you won't admit to having accomplished something personally via violence? therefore violence never achieved anything
That seems irrational.
no plan
<has expressed no plan himself
That seems hypocritical.
Don't want gibs? Make 'em work.
They won't and they can't do anything worth a wage.
You want violence? Fine, you go first, set an example.
You know very well that one person doing a thing is often ineffective relative to many doing that thing, particularly in politics.
Don't like Trump? Promote another candidate
<kosher sandwich doesn't exist got
or don't vote and let other people choose for you.
<voting is real and the people decide the elections!
That seems inaccurate.
Wanna burn down the government? Again, you go first, set an example.
See above.
Don't have anything to say but memepost blackpilling? STFU then.
Your entire post is memepost blackpilling though.
99% of /pol/ is shills and brainless shitposters now.
But your post is 100% the textbook definition of shilling, you're aggressively promoting on behalf of ampolitical candidate, and using very bad faith arguments in doing so, making it also a shitpost.
[–] 16622937? ago
Is this racist?