0
1

[–] 16593074? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Well if you want to get all technical, can you show us where in the constitution the police are allowed to keep and bear arms?

0
0

[–] 16593124? ago 

Really, I don't have the time to be a lawfag.

My job is biblical. Love is all I need, what do you need?

1
1

[–] 16590699? 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Bumps Stocks aren't covered by the Constitution.

They absolutely are. The 2nd Amendment says:

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This is being restricted as a taboo form of armament. Which is an infringment upon our right to keep and bear arms.

then it can be discussed once again.

You will have to forgive my skepticism. Rights, once encroached upon, are rarely ever restored or expanded upon. They only tend to shrink, and our natural right to defend ourselves and keep our rulers in check has already been unreasonably restricted. I will never budge on this.

0
0

[–] 16590792? ago 

You do realize what bump stocks are right?

It isn't infringing on anything.

Love needs to get used more often. Logic as well.

1
0

[–] 16590901? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

They are a piece of rigid plastic which makes it easier to fire a gun in such a fashion as to rapidly depress the trigger.They aren't a gun, they are a part of a gun. But banning specific gun parts is just as noxious and unforgivable as banning entire weapons or types of weapons.

You are doing a shit job of convincing me that their banning isn't a betrayal.

love love love

Stuff your hippy shit. Love won't stop deep state bullets. Love won't topple tyrants. Force, and the ability to project it in defense of those we Love, is necessary.