1
6

[–] bman0321 1 point 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

Imagine that, another AGW theory turned out to be wrong.

0
3

[–] toobaditworks 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

We've been telling them their projections are wrong for twenty plus years and now they're saying "💡We kinda suspected....". Hmmm what gave it away? The fact we told you over and over with stone cold evidence or when we saw your leaked emails that proved you've fudged the data? Someone call Las Vegas police on this pronto! We need to find a motive here🔍! It's definitely NOT carbon credit trading.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] toobaditworks ago  (edited ago)

Yep just look into Enrons roll in trading carbon credits. Or just read this handy PDF: http://channelingreality.com/Power/Kyoto_Conspiracy_.pdf and even handier quote below:

About 20 years ago Enron was owner and operator of an interstate network of natural gas pipelines, and had transformed itself into a billion-dollar-a-day commodity trader, buying and selling contracts and their derivatives to deliver natural gas, electricity, internet bandwidth, whatever. The 1990 Clean Air Act amendments authorized the Environmental Protection Agency to put a cap on how much pollutant the operator of a fossil-fueled plant was allowed to emit. In the early 1990s Enron had helped establish the market for, and became the major trader in, EPA’s $20 billion-per-year sulphur dioxide cap-and-trade program, the forerunner of today’s proposed carbon credit trade.

This commodity exchange of emission allowances caused Enron’s stock to rapidly rise. Then came the inevitable question, what next? How about a carbon dioxide cap-and-trade program?

The problem was that CO2 is not a pollutant, and therefore the EPA had no authority to cap its emission. Al Gore took office in 1993 and almost immediately became infatuated with the idea of an international environmental regulatory regime. He led a U.S. initiative to review new projects around the world and issue ‘credits’ of so many tons of annual CO2 emission reduction. Under law a tradeable system was required, which was exactly what Enron also wanted because they were already trading pollutant credits. Thence Enron vigorously lobbied Clinton and Congress, seeking EPA regulatory authority over CO2. From 1994 to 1996, the Enron Foundation contributed nearly $1 million dollars - $990,000 - to the Nature Conservancy, whose Climate Change Project promotes global warming theories.

Enron philanthropists lavished almost $1.5 million on environmental groups that support international energy controls to “reduce” global warming. Executives at Enron worked closely with the Clinton administration to help create a scaremongering cl imate science environment because the company believed the treaty could provide it with a monstrous financial windfall. The plan was that once the problem was in place the solution would be trotted out.

0
4

[–] CrustyBeaver52 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

More precise to say they haven't got a clue, but they were very well paid to lie about it.

1
2

[–] ZKX 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Looks like they need more government money to pay for further research. How about another tax hike to pay for it.

0
0

[–] toobaditworks ago 

Great idea! I like how you think. Maybe even some futures trading in weather pattern predictions also on wallstreet. That should fix things. "El Niño is up on the DOW today +6%". 🤑🤑🤑

0
3

[–] burnthegoyimhaters 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

fluid flow and dynamics of liquid and smoke are practically impossible to model correctly in a real world scenario. Too many unknowns. So they make a model off of observable evidence they have and run with it. It's hardly ever correct. But can get pretty close sometimes. It's why the weather guy is wrong most the time and can still keep his job.

0
2

[–] toobaditworks 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Weather guy? Did you just assume xer pronouns? ASK FORGIVENESS NOW OR THE CLIMATE WILL NEVER CHANGE!

0
1

[–] NogHunter9000 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

no you bigot the climate will change UNLESS you ask for forgiveness from Xer weatherperson,

the only reason climate changes is evil republicans, otherwise the world would be a perfect average all over

0
2

[–] Dortex 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Good that we can get some data on the more frigid climates now.

0
1

[–] toobaditworks 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Can we magically change the numbers to be what we want? Please???? ➕➖➗❌?

0
0

[–] Dortex ago 

No. The entire point of this is to stop guessing.

0
0

[–] DestroyerOfSaturn ago 

What are you people talking about? Trump cured global warming in just 2 years. Hello polar vortex.

0
1

[–] MrThursday 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

If we end up dead by climate change, it'll be a classic "Boy who cried Wolf" case.

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)