[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] crazy_cajun 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I am pretty sure there are enough people in rural Oregon that will challenge this law if it passes all the way to the SC. With the current crop of justices it will be struck down. I would also hope that if it should pass and people are hurt physically and financially because of it the SC would induce a horrendous penalty on the state government to pay those people for their losses. That should send a strong message to the other 49 states unless you still live in the Obummer era and then it would 51 other states.
At 20 rounds per month.. It would take 4 months to save up enough ammo to go target shooting, So they are saying that they want only the people that havent practiced to be able to shoot! "The right to bear arms shall not be infringed" And what is the NRA doing to help protect these citizens rights ? Class action lawsuit !!!
[–] mslibertyrider ago
The DS is everywhere...take a glance at this article about what happened in Iowa. I disagree with the author who does not believe the elected official committed 'political sabotage on Iowan's gun rights.' https://www.ammoland.com/2019/01/iowa-secretary-of-state-error-sets-back-right-to-keep-bear-arms-amendment/#axzz5dxJcbwt8
[–] clamhurt_legbeard 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Carry a revolver, leave after shooting your attacker.