1
44

[–] 657123 1 point 44 points (+45|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Aushwitz was demolished by the (((Soviets))), then rebuilt. It's the Disney Land of Jewish prop - aganda.

Or der O4 2 8

0
8

[–] AttackHelicopter 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

More like prop-agenda.

0
28

[–] superspathi 0 points 28 points (+28|-0) ago 

I made a comment in Breitbart expressing skepticism of the official Ww2 narrative and was banned from the site in an hour.

0
20

[–] regulator1488 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

Disqus IP banned all of my accounts for questioning the Holohoax.

0
11

[–] superspathi 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

I think that specific word has magical power to get the user unpersoned.

0
3

[–] matthew-- 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Thats one thing I really don't like about Bitchute. Why the hell would you use a service like disqus?

0
11

[–] KnightFalcon 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Is Breitbart run by kikes? (serious question). Ben Schapiro was there, that could be an indication.

0
14

[–] Napierdalator 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Yup.

0
11

[–] Honey_Pot 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Absolutely. Soros is big investor. You can't even mention his name, but you can still summons him by numeral: 666

good news aggregator

https://www.whatfinger.com/

0
1

[–] superspathi 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I wouldn't know. But they certainly appear to be as intolerant of certain wrongthink as any SJW gang.

1
9

[–] PeacefulAssassin 1 point 9 points (+10|-1) ago 

yeach Brietbart banned me too! didn't even post holocaust denial stuff.
posted "oy vey" on an article about the anti isreal boycott bill.
just more proof as to (((who))) runs that site.
also saw that they deleted a lot of other posting calling put the bill for being unconstitutional.

0
10

[–] Rawrination 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

We don't call it Kikebart for nothing.

0
6

[–] doubleanalbypass 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

you mean you suggested hitler was a british agent? isn't it abundantly clear that all of the 20th century and even back to napoleone, all wars were carefully set-up by rothschilds? rothschilds are zionists btw. so there you have the motives. one has to applaude them for their rather creative plan to ultimately beat the germans by exploiting their addiction to drumroll : GUILT.

one can think of the rothfucks what he wants, but one can not deny they are rather fucking smart.

0
15

[–] Far2Long2 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

We deny what does not exist.

There are no square circles, nor round squares.

No gas chambers, no crematoria, no graves.

0
11

[–] draaaak 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago  (edited ago)

"These morgues and showers identify as gas chambers"

[–] [deleted] ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
12

[–] SlightMassacre 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

They goyim know.

0
5

[–] doubleanalbypass 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

more jews need to speak out and become active against zionism. it will be the end of us all if we don't take down global zionism.

0
1

[–] Chad88 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Or just let whites have their own states too. Like I don't blame them for wanting to preserve their culture and ethnicity. I blame them for acting like it's a moral crime for anyone else to do the same. We all have to at least publicly pretend that we have no concept of genetics, and no internal drive to have our own kids. We have to go along with pretending gender is a feeling and diversity is the most valuable thing ever. Or, we could just quit the bs.

0
9

[–] CaliforniaOrange 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Who cares?

Assuming that it DID HAPPEN, why should we have a special day for one group of people when millions of others have also been massacred that we don’t have a day for?

Also assuming it did happen, we shouldn’t be cut at the knees because of something that happened in the past. It’s called MOVING ON.

It’s funny how leftist and Jews love to give the life advice of “move on with your life” and “get over it”. Yet when it comes to the holocaust we are supposed to remember it year in and year out and punish ourselves everyday.

FUCK. THAT. SHIT.

Edit: if it didn’t happen I understand their fear, their myth is collapsing.

Personally, I don’t give a shit if it did or didn’t, it’s irrelevant to today.

0
2

[–] 475677 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It's no irrelevant today. In less than the span of a human lifetime they've gone from apparently nearly being exterminated to fucking over every nation on earth. This only proves that if we want our countries back again expulsion simply will not suffice. We've tried that what 359 times already? They've since historically proven that attempting to genocide them isn't good enough. We absolutely must kill them all men, women, children and even their babies due to the fact that the children absolutely will grow up to be full blown kikes that will rightfully hold a grudge against us.

There's only one solution for the kike problem and by playing their holohoax card they've forced it to be a final one.

0
9

[–] AttackHelicopter 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

It's almost like European countries are tired of being flogged for the made up sins of their great grand parents.

0
7

[–] StoneAgeTribeman 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

competitive victimization, emphasizing the experience of Polish victims over that of Jewish victims.

Well, I think it's only logical that Poland would want Polish people to be more concerned with Polish victims, no?

1 in 20 Britons don’t believe the Holocaust took place at all

That's probably the new "Brits".

0
1

[–] Warnos44 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Sssh! Let me believe it's the real ones.

0
1

[–] avgwhtguy1 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Any Brit with a brain and without a Noble Title moved to Oz or Canada years ago

4
-3

[–] Thepimp 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

Serious question- If the holocaust didn’t happen then why did the Nazis at the Nuremberg Trials not deny it happened ? They acknowledged it happened. Most simply tried to pass blame to others. Why would that be?

0
5

[–] cdglow 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

It would be interesting to look into the history of the trial further, but consider some of these points.

  • What specifically did these defendants say? Did anybody confess to there being an actual systemic gassing program, or did they just say they couldn't deny that the program existed? There's a difference between those two things. Would the media of the time and historians be crystal clear about what was actually claimed?
  • How many of the Nazis charged at Nuremberg would have been in position to know details about a mass gassing program that was so top secret that no documentation was ever found? Would random generals and admirals and other people not all of the way at the top know details about this? Which would have been the key witnesses to the alleged gassing program? Whose testimony actually matters here?
  • Don't discount the power of torture and threats to family members.
  • Conduct a simple thought experiment. Imagine you're a Nazi locked up in a jail cell and fairly isolated until the trials are setup. Briefly before the trial, you're presented with the charges and given some limited access to a fixed lawyer. Even assuming that these prisoners were not tortured or threatened, at the very least they're psychologically demoralized and subject to intense Allied propaganda in that time and don't have any realistic way to conduct an actual defense. You're brought before the Nuremberg court and told your country engaged in mass gassings of Jews. You're presented some random evidence that the gassings happened that you have no way to verify. How can you truthfully claim that you deny this event in that situation?
  • Keep in mind that this was a kangaroo court at best.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art19

Article 19.

The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply to the greatest possible extent expeditious and nontechnical procedure, and shall admit any evidence which it deems to be of probative value.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art21

Article 21.

The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also take judicial notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United Nations, including the acts and documents of the committees set up in the various allied countries for the investigation of war crimes, and of records and findings of military or other Tribunals of any of the United Nations.

0
3

[–] notYOURfriend 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

"Deny it happened and we'll torture your family to death", perhaps?

0
3

[–] Marku1 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

ok, cool, you believe in the narrative of Nuremberg than you must conclude as well that most of our own western leaders need to hang as well.... (see Chomsky, lefts own gate keeper) ............if (lets suppose) the chinese invade us and expose our own crimes we all will be hanged for supporting them (our leaders), so let us at least try to change something now before they fuck all of us....

1
-1

[–] Thepimp 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

So you say Nuremberg was a sham? Again, serious question. Not being a shill, just trying to understand what you believe.

load more comments ▼ (14 remaining)