4
-3

[–] Thepimp 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

Serious question- If the holocaust didn’t happen then why did the Nazis at the Nuremberg Trials not deny it happened ? They acknowledged it happened. Most simply tried to pass blame to others. Why would that be?

0
3

[–] Marku1 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

ok, cool, you believe in the narrative of Nuremberg than you must conclude as well that most of our own western leaders need to hang as well.... (see Chomsky, lefts own gate keeper) ............if (lets suppose) the chinese invade us and expose our own crimes we all will be hanged for supporting them (our leaders), so let us at least try to change something now before they fuck all of us....

1
-1

[–] Thepimp 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

So you say Nuremberg was a sham? Again, serious question. Not being a shill, just trying to understand what you believe.

0
3

[–] notYOURfriend 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

"Deny it happened and we'll torture your family to death", perhaps?

0
5

[–] cdglow 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

It would be interesting to look into the history of the trial further, but consider some of these points.

  • What specifically did these defendants say? Did anybody confess to there being an actual systemic gassing program, or did they just say they couldn't deny that the program existed? There's a difference between those two things. Would the media of the time and historians be crystal clear about what was actually claimed?
  • How many of the Nazis charged at Nuremberg would have been in position to know details about a mass gassing program that was so top secret that no documentation was ever found? Would random generals and admirals and other people not all of the way at the top know details about this? Which would have been the key witnesses to the alleged gassing program? Whose testimony actually matters here?
  • Don't discount the power of torture and threats to family members.
  • Conduct a simple thought experiment. Imagine you're a Nazi locked up in a jail cell and fairly isolated until the trials are setup. Briefly before the trial, you're presented with the charges and given some limited access to a fixed lawyer. Even assuming that these prisoners were not tortured or threatened, at the very least they're psychologically demoralized and subject to intense Allied propaganda in that time and don't have any realistic way to conduct an actual defense. You're brought before the Nuremberg court and told your country engaged in mass gassings of Jews. You're presented some random evidence that the gassings happened that you have no way to verify. How can you truthfully claim that you deny this event in that situation?
  • Keep in mind that this was a kangaroo court at best.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art19

Article 19.

The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply to the greatest possible extent expeditious and nontechnical procedure, and shall admit any evidence which it deems to be of probative value.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art21

Article 21.

The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also take judicial notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United Nations, including the acts and documents of the committees set up in the various allied countries for the investigation of war crimes, and of records and findings of military or other Tribunals of any of the United Nations.

1
-1

[–] NoKiddin 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Strange, since there were many camps here during the WWII but not only Jews were killed. People keep putting that fact under the rug portraying Jews as the biggest victims. They make it seem as if only they were dying during the war. I watched some French documentary about Jews being killed in my city. They made it seem as the whole Eastern Europe was crowded with Jews. One would get an impression there were more of them than us natives.

0
0

[–] HenryCabotLodge ago 

Well, if correct the numbers have to be more in the range of 600K to 1M, not 6M.

0
0

[–] senpaithatignoresyou ago 

Huh, I wonder if this has something to do with the influx of muslims into Europe?

0
0

[–] Gunk ago 

WTF I love Polacks now!

0
0

[–] vastrightwing ago 

Psst! Don't like people pointing out misfeasance of jews? Then, please explain this.

0
0

[–] Walk1 ago 

They are basically asking for Eastern Europeans to be recognized as victims in the Holocaust, which has not been recognized for sometime, as all the focus has centered around the Jews.

0
0

[–] doubleanalbypass ago 

lovely how many sjws think they are fighting the good fight by fighting "nazis" a phantom of the past, while what einstein called "worse than then nazis" are not being fought by these idiots: zionists.

(einstein was approached by the zionists after the war and encouraged to work for them, he responded with a "why would I want to do that, you are worse than the nazis")

load more comments ▼ (14 remaining)