0
9

[–] CaliforniaOrange 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Who cares?

Assuming that it DID HAPPEN, why should we have a special day for one group of people when millions of others have also been massacred that we don’t have a day for?

Also assuming it did happen, we shouldn’t be cut at the knees because of something that happened in the past. It’s called MOVING ON.

It’s funny how leftist and Jews love to give the life advice of “move on with your life” and “get over it”. Yet when it comes to the holocaust we are supposed to remember it year in and year out and punish ourselves everyday.

FUCK. THAT. SHIT.

Edit: if it didn’t happen I understand their fear, their myth is collapsing.

Personally, I don’t give a shit if it did or didn’t, it’s irrelevant to today.

0
2

[–] 475677 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It's no irrelevant today. In less than the span of a human lifetime they've gone from apparently nearly being exterminated to fucking over every nation on earth. This only proves that if we want our countries back again expulsion simply will not suffice. We've tried that what 359 times already? They've since historically proven that attempting to genocide them isn't good enough. We absolutely must kill them all men, women, children and even their babies due to the fact that the children absolutely will grow up to be full blown kikes that will rightfully hold a grudge against us.

There's only one solution for the kike problem and by playing their holohoax card they've forced it to be a final one.

0
3

[–] DavidHogg 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Is RT the last news site that don’t censor comments?

0
0

[–] doubleanalbypass ago 

lovely how many sjws think they are fighting the good fight by fighting "nazis" a phantom of the past, while what einstein called "worse than then nazis" are not being fought by these idiots: zionists.

(einstein was approached by the zionists after the war and encouraged to work for them, he responded with a "why would I want to do that, you are worse than the nazis")

0
0

[–] BlowjaySimpson ago 

Watch the doc The Last Days of The Big Lie. Get it to the normies.

0
0

[–] baneofretail ago 

I really hope that Putin, being ex kgb and their current president, he's probably seen the Soviet Era documents that outline the holohoax.

0
4

[–] Warnos44 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Look into Putin and his very close relationship with the Chabad Jews. It's important to realize they own everyone in power.

0
1

[–] baneofretail 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Damn. That sucks.

0
3

[–] 16433539? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Let us never forget, that the holocaust never happened.

0
3

[–] MrPim 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

If we do not remember it didn't happen, it may not happen again.

0
7

[–] StoneAgeTribeman 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

competitive victimization, emphasizing the experience of Polish victims over that of Jewish victims.

Well, I think it's only logical that Poland would want Polish people to be more concerned with Polish victims, no?

1 in 20 Britons don’t believe the Holocaust took place at all

That's probably the new "Brits".

0
1

[–] Warnos44 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Sssh! Let me believe it's the real ones.

0
1

[–] avgwhtguy1 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Any Brit with a brain and without a Noble Title moved to Oz or Canada years ago

4
-3

[–] Thepimp 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

Serious question- If the holocaust didn’t happen then why did the Nazis at the Nuremberg Trials not deny it happened ? They acknowledged it happened. Most simply tried to pass blame to others. Why would that be?

0
5

[–] cdglow 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

It would be interesting to look into the history of the trial further, but consider some of these points.

  • What specifically did these defendants say? Did anybody confess to there being an actual systemic gassing program, or did they just say they couldn't deny that the program existed? There's a difference between those two things. Would the media of the time and historians be crystal clear about what was actually claimed?
  • How many of the Nazis charged at Nuremberg would have been in position to know details about a mass gassing program that was so top secret that no documentation was ever found? Would random generals and admirals and other people not all of the way at the top know details about this? Which would have been the key witnesses to the alleged gassing program? Whose testimony actually matters here?
  • Don't discount the power of torture and threats to family members.
  • Conduct a simple thought experiment. Imagine you're a Nazi locked up in a jail cell and fairly isolated until the trials are setup. Briefly before the trial, you're presented with the charges and given some limited access to a fixed lawyer. Even assuming that these prisoners were not tortured or threatened, at the very least they're psychologically demoralized and subject to intense Allied propaganda in that time and don't have any realistic way to conduct an actual defense. You're brought before the Nuremberg court and told your country engaged in mass gassings of Jews. You're presented some random evidence that the gassings happened that you have no way to verify. How can you truthfully claim that you deny this event in that situation?
  • Keep in mind that this was a kangaroo court at best.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art19

Article 19.

The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply to the greatest possible extent expeditious and nontechnical procedure, and shall admit any evidence which it deems to be of probative value.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art21

Article 21.

The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also take judicial notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United Nations, including the acts and documents of the committees set up in the various allied countries for the investigation of war crimes, and of records and findings of military or other Tribunals of any of the United Nations.

0
3

[–] Marku1 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

ok, cool, you believe in the narrative of Nuremberg than you must conclude as well that most of our own western leaders need to hang as well.... (see Chomsky, lefts own gate keeper) ............if (lets suppose) the chinese invade us and expose our own crimes we all will be hanged for supporting them (our leaders), so let us at least try to change something now before they fuck all of us....

1
-1

[–] Thepimp 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

So you say Nuremberg was a sham? Again, serious question. Not being a shill, just trying to understand what you believe.

0
3

[–] notYOURfriend 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

"Deny it happened and we'll torture your family to death", perhaps?

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)