Surprisingly not as huge as one would thing, you have probably seen a few. She is a 32 band size, which means she has a small ribcage, estimate around 27-29 inches? So waist would obviously be small maybe 25 inches (do not want to insult her it could be less)? 32 is also smaller cup size that larger band size. So to explain, a 32dd would be the same size boob (generally) as a 34d, 36c, or 38b. The only difference is the size of the ribcage (or fat on the ribcage etc) and the distribution of boob fats.
You look absolutely lovely. In between 32dd and 34d here and being tall, no one notices much. I get more comments on being thin. Which I am MEH on. 22 BMI and still have 10 lbs to move around. My obsession with tacos does not help.
[–] hypercat 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Surprisingly not as huge as one would thing, you have probably seen a few. She is a 32 band size, which means she has a small ribcage, estimate around 27-29 inches? So waist would obviously be small maybe 25 inches (do not want to insult her it could be less)? 32 is also smaller cup size that larger band size. So to explain, a 32dd would be the same size boob (generally) as a 34d, 36c, or 38b. The only difference is the size of the ribcage (or fat on the ribcage etc) and the distribution of boob fats.
[–] dancemonkey [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
I was 28E at that point - pregnancy expands your ribcage unfortunately so I'm now a 32. Looked pretty good though.
This is me in wedding dress. N.B. I do not have a fat ass, it's a bustle.
[–] hypercat ago
You look absolutely lovely. In between 32dd and 34d here and being tall, no one notices much. I get more comments on being thin. Which I am MEH on. 22 BMI and still have 10 lbs to move around. My obsession with tacos does not help.
[–] GenevieveJenkins ago (edited ago)
Can confirm. Source: 28D