(Continued…)
<wacko
<cult
<wacko cult
<[ad nauseam]
Before Waco, one of the only shreds of the United States Constitution which had not yet been totally abrogated was its protection of religious freedom. What Waco showed was that if your religion is deemed sufficiently heretical by the high priests of B’nai B’rith, the System needn't even take the trouble of an Inquisition: It needs only to declare you a "wacko cult" before consigning you to a holy bonfire.
Lest my sympathies be somehow misconstrued, I should point out that the publication from which I took my primary departure, Liberty Bell, was a militantly anti-Christian magazine which regularly ran articles by such men as Ben Klassen, Nicholas Carter, and Dr. Revilo P. Oliver, to whose article on Waco I referred. In my considered opinion, all of Christianity is a "cult" — "pure and simple". Objectively, the Davidians' brand of Jesus-juice was no more "wacko" than the supercilious superstitions of other Christians. Moreover, because they did not actively proselytize, the Davidians were far less annoying than Evangelical Christians from mainline ((("social gospel"))) churches. By your standards, Janet Reno should have sent some Delta Force to burn every church in the country, with all parishioners inside. Lenin would be proud.
Fortunately, unlike you, I have moral standards which prohibit me from gloating over the mass-incineration of innocent Aryan men, women, and children, however disagreeable I may find their silly superstitions.
<but the problematic nature of the Waco Cult meant that you could never go far to defend them before someone pointed out they were a wacko cult. Just like I am doing to you now.
The deeper lesson of Waco is that if the jewsmedia decide that you're a "cult", real wackos like this anon will go so far as to defend massacring you until someone points out that this was a mass-murder of Americans by "their" government. "Just like I am doing to you now."
<>197/yr
<>20/yr
<>15/yr
<>academic journals 20,000/yr
<I would hardly count this as a wide availability of alternative information.
Ah, the world of gimme free in current year. No wonder "alternative media" has so much trouble surviving without porn ads.
Your "20,000/yr" is a strawman: I did not list any academic journals, at that price or otherwise. Excepting the outlier of Criminal Politics, all of the publications I listed or referred to >>12443148 were affordable to the average American in 1993 dollars. My primary reference above, Liberty Bell, stated a base subscription price of $40.00 per year in the September, 1993 issue which I quoted. George Dietz卐 could barely keep his press running at that rate, because however surprising you may find this, it costs money to run a publication — at least, at any reasonable standard of quality. A mimeograph machine in somebody's basement does not make for a quality publication (and even that would require some money to run).
Befuddling as the concept must be to some people nowadays, the practice of charging money for a print publication was by no means exclusive to "alternative media". For example, although I do not recollect its price, I know that the Time magazine issue I vividly recall from circa April of 1993 charged shekels to inform its readers that members of a wacko cult led by a sadistic paedophile who claimed to be Jesus had torched themselves whilst their kindly Federal saviors wept in desperation.
<EASILY ACCESIBLE [sic] AND WIDELY AVAILABLE FORM OF ALMOST-FREE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA
But in your book, if it doesn't (((magically))) show up for "almost-free" on the boob-tube or today's Internet equivalent, it may as well not exist. Well, I suppose it doesn't — not for apathetic couch potatoes who don't matter, anyway.
[–] 16383142? ago
Waco was an opportunity for Clinton to act out his cherished fantasy of being the American Lenin, destroying churches and mass-murdering the pious with total impunity!
Daily reminder that the massacre at Waco was the murder of the freedom of religion in the United States.
The Mote and the Beam
>>12521677 (checking myself)
Anybody who professes to be a Christian should perpend the message at Matthew 7:3 ff., Luke 6:41 ff., before calling anyone a "cult". For in America, it is the magic word which annuls religious freedom.
If you are merely an indifferent attendee at a weekly Sunday morning snoozefest, then you don't need religious freedom: You are only a cheap hypocrite who believes in nothing.
If you follow a Zionist-Communist "mainline" church which preaches "social justice"☭, neverforgetfulness over the (((Six Million Holy Lampshades))), and unlimited support for the Jewish squatters in Palestine, then you don't need religious freedom: You follow the Jewnited States' established state religion.
But Yahweh forbid you actually believe in anything which contradicts the least jot of your (((masters'))) edicts! No, really: Yahweh forbids it. If you sufficiently peeve him, then he will show his disapproval with Biblical plagues of bullets, poison gas, and tanks rolling over the ashes of your sacred home.
Every American who sincerely believes in any non-Jewish, non-ZOG-sanctioned religion must immediately recognize the implications of Waco for his own freedom of worship. That could have been your church! All it takes is for the jewspapers to slap you with the "cult" label, and millions of Americans will cheer >>12371446 as you get burned at the stake — whether metaphorically, or with actual fire. Then, after your life is destroyed and/or your whole family is reduced to ashes, some self-righteous sick sack of shit will rationalize your murder just like this:
>>12517180
<the problematic nature of the Waco Cult meant that you could never go far to defend them before someone pointed out they were a wacko cult. Just like I am doing to you now.
If you are an earnest believer in any religion, read those words with a shiver; for however much you may disagree with the Davidians' theology, unless you lie to yourself, you cannot but have the thought, "There but for the grace of God go I."