0
0

[–] 16383123? ago 

(Continued…)

>>12455238

Remember that a government is not a person. It is not human despite its operations being done by humans, in the same way that an ant colony is not an ant despite being made of ants.

I just take the approach that sees the animal that is the system, which humans have to deal with whether it is good or bad or somewhere in-between.

Governments either consider humans productive towards itself, neutral, or damaging through how they interact with its sensory organs.

You treat government as if it were a natural phenomenon! But although degenerate governments run amok do indeed tend to display the collective emergent behaviors you describe, government is nevertheless made by men; and as with all things man-made, the question must be asked as to its purpose.

In the past, I myself made the same mistake. Rather than observing only the concrete form of governments currently existing, take a deeper look at government in the abstract.

For reasons too complex to elucidate in a /pol/ post, I recognize only one proper purpose for a government:

The State is only a means to an end. Its end and its purpose is to preserve and promote a community of human beings who are physically as well as spiritually kindred. Those States which do not serve this purpose have no justification for their existence. They are monstrosities. The fact that they do exist is no more of a justification than the successful raids carried out by a band of pirates can be considered a justification of piracy. [Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf II, Chapter 2.]

For ants, an ant colony actually meets that definition of the purpose of a "government". The order of the colony "is to preserve and promote a community" of kindred ants — and it is indeed the means of their reproductive survival as a species! All ants work together, so that their queen can lay the next generation of eggs — not so that she can "collect resources", as you put it.

But again, human governments are made by men; and you err in treating them as if they were facts of Nature. If men have created a government which exists for its "ability to collect resources" as you say, i.e. to enslave the populace, then it is not only failing that purpose, but actively contradicting it.

And whenever a State has no proper purpose, it is not only the right but also the duty of every man to resist and overthrow it. I would even prefer bloody, miserable anarchy as a lesser evil compared to an omnipotent tyranny which systematically enslaves and exterminates the White race (this last ongoing via demographic genocide and miscegenation). I am not here drawing a dichotomy: I am describing what we actually have today, both in the United States and in Europe.

Hutterites

shrewd bastards in business and politics

So, they are eager participants in the game of chasing the Federal Reserve debt-scrip which Americans use instead of money.

Otherwise stated, they are not a threat to the System.

It is myopic at best to support a System which will eat your children if and when it finds that convenient. So much for posterity. Let's see how well the Hutterites fare when they are swamped by a non-White majority, who will be immune to all attempts to "leverage their religious oddities to guilt local people". Neither Chinese nor mestizos are susceptible to such "guilt".

(And neither are niggers — but that doesn't really matter; I expect that the universally hated niggers will be physically exterminated when either the Chinese or the mestizos gain power, probably within the next 100 years in North America. Observe how within the past 10-15 years, mestizo gangs have already been ethnically cleansing territory they desire in the Los Angeles area. They have no qualms about shooting pickaninnies in the street, for maximal terror effect. The jewsmedia try to paper over this, to sustain the White "liberal" lie that only Whites are "racist" and all the colored folks just love each other. Meanwhile, the Chinese have been quietly colonizing Africa; come time, the ruthless Asians will exterminate every nigger in Africa with exactly as much emotion as you would feel when spraying cockroaches.)

I will here paraphrase and adapt Captain Ramsay's observation that the Jew paralyzes resistance with avarice encouraged by his capitalist right hand, before his left hand strikes with the revolutionary dagger of proletarian agitation.