0
0

[–] 16339920? ago 

I could support a very late term abortion in your case. It's never too late

0
0

[–] 16339925? ago 

Im going to abort you, you are only 20 years and you are in the same world as I am, my world my choice

0
0

[–] 16364079? ago 

Im going to abort you, you are only 20 years and you are in the same world as I am, my world my choice

Sometimes the simplest answers are the best ones. A baby that is 1 second from being born isn't a human, and thus can be killed? OK, so we're hinging on that word "human". Well I don't consider kikes, niggers or shitskins of any shade human, and whiny bitches will get slapped the fuck down if they complain about it as is their natural right. Let the games begin

0
0

[–] 16339926? ago 

And the father should have a say

0
0

[–] 16339928? ago 

sometimes you are a Low IQ nympho who like cocks every day and is too lazy to take the pill, dont worry thats what eugenics are for

0
0

[–] 16340807? ago 

women die during child birth

go back to your mom's basement

How do you go back to your mother's supposed basement if she's dead?

>>>/kitchen/

0
0

[–] 16340887? ago 

When will you realize we do not live in our mothers basement, but rather, rent free, in your head?

0
0

[–] 16340888? ago 

Honey, if you all lived in my head, abortion would be globally legal without a reason or restriction.

0
0

[–] 16340919? ago 

But no one should be forced to carry a child

No one is being forced. A pregnant woman already carries a child by natural causes, no forceful act from the state is involved. We're just saying she should be punished for killing that child unless it was immediately threatening her. The lack of a third option does not make an evil action good.

Suppose there WAS a third option, and unborn children could be transferred to another woman or a machine or an animal, that carries them to term with an equal survival rate at a negligible cost. Anyone who requests abortion can get it with no blood on their hands. Would it then be evil for a woman to specifically request DEATH of her unborn child? After all, it's inside her body to do as she wishes, right? The more I learn about modern Feminism, the more I suspect the far left would defend that.

0
0

[–] 16340927? ago 

Would it then be evil for a woman to specifically request DEATH of her unborn child?

No, no it wouldn't. Blood of her own blood and what now, she should have the right to end it, as it had come out of her, undoubtedly so.

No one is being forced.

By not being given the freedom of abortion, they are being forced to carry them.

. We're just saying she should be punished for killing that child unless it was immediately threatening her.

That is unfair for her.

After all, it's inside her body to do as she wishes, right?

Rightly so.

The lack of a third option does not make an evil action good.

It doesn't matter, a woman is the master of her own destiny and fate.

0
0

[–] 16343078? ago 

Its also the blood of the man, he also should have the right to end it

There is literally no reason to abort unless you were raped or of the child is a literal subhuman or if you could be killed but I would make an exception to you, I hope you try to get an abortion in Ireland atleast they would refuse

No its not, unless you are an irresponsible whore

The moment she was pregnant she stops having an excuse for being irresponsible

0
0

[–] 16343150? ago 

By not being given the freedom of abortion, they are being forced to carry them.

They do have the freedom of abortion. They are free to end their pregnancy. They are not free to intentionally kill an innocent human. The former implies the latter, but that is a limitation of technology, not morality. That is why we use the term "pro-life", not "pro-pregnancy". We really do not care that a pregnancy ends (in fact it would be strange if it did not), only that a human life was needlessly taken.

If you murder someone using a gun, the fact that you owned and fired a gun is not evil, only the murder part is evil.

0
0

[–] 16346976? ago 

let's pretend women reproduce asexually by claiming it is "blood of her own blood" and NOT half the father's blood as well

Why are liberals fundamentally retarded and anti-science & anti-reason?

0
0

[–] 16343031? ago 

Women regularly suffocated, drowned, or abandoned their babies to be eaten by wild animals. That is the type of person you are arguing with. They want the option to kill their children. It is why the state is involved in the first place.

0
0

[–] 16343037? ago 

But no one should be forced to carry a child

This is always a shit argument.

Nobody forced the woman to have sex.

muh rape

Always be with a man, or a herd of women who are all armed.

PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

0
0

[–] 16344240? ago 

abortion helps society at large by preventing crime

it's good to kill innocent children for potential crimes they might commit in the future

0
0

[–] 16344243? ago 

The kinds of people who want abotions shouldn't be raising children anyway, so what's your point?>>12713784

it kills a few niggers and spics in the short term

Look at the numbers christcucks love to throw around. Niggers are vastly overrepresented in abortion statistics. Also,

he doesn't keep gifs of niggers getting raped & shot to post for /leftypol/

Are you even trying?

0
0

[–] 16344245? ago 

Second part meant for>>12713784

0
0

[–] 16345603? ago 

My point is the aborted children did nothing wrong and should not pay for potential future crimes. It was a rebuttal to the "abortion lowers crime" argument. My point is simply an eye for an eye.

I never brought up "the kinds of people who want abortions" or "raising children" so your reply is a non-sequitur. But even if the child's parents are potentially bad, that doesn't justify killing the child.

You seem to be approaching this issue from a social planning angle and I fundamentally disagree because it's too authoritarian.