0
0

[–] 16366403? ago 

Saying a jew's name is not "naming the jew," retard.

0
0

[–] 16341922? ago 

BASED!

0
0

[–] 16341910? ago 

It's funny because he began to move in the right direction up until he became a Christian ideologue.

0
0

[–] 16340962? ago 

Excellent. Now that molyjew has typed "levision," the race war can begin.

0
0

[–] 16340958? ago 

based and redpilled

0
0

[–] 16393894? ago 

He certainly doesn't look like a jew.

>>12713463

There were "jews" in the Third Reich who abandoned their cult, way of life, traditions and ideologies to adopt that of the Germanic way of life. Surprise surprise, parents who are 10% semitic, and claim to be jewish can have a son who doesn't identify with that lineage or cult.

>>12723266

Third Reich didn't have a one drop rule.

Not defending this e-celeb, who has had opinions all over the spectrum and cannot be trusted, but this idea that partial jews cannot absolutely detest and abandon that part of their lineage is just more jewry. It plays into the hands of jews, and they know, that this kind of divisive puritanism can serve as endless source of D&C. Why? Because in America, nearly everyone is mixed, either mixed European or some other kind of mongrelization. Racial segregation occurs through spousal choice, then in the later stages of this conflict, when we can return to a technocratic tribal way of life.

0
0

[–] 16340955? ago 

Molyjew divert attention away from him being a jew

I-I'm the good guy here goy!

OK I guess.

0
0

[–] 16340130? ago 

Whilst I generally hate e-celebs, and Molyneux is perhaps the most arrogant and narcissistic prick out there who is actually terrible at debating and regularly uses logical fallacies himself, despite being quick to criticise others for doing so; his 'documentaries' are actually top-tier. I do not have to like man or accept any of his beliefs to be able to admit that he is good at informing people about what happens in regards to high-publicity events and those things which the media downplays (like IQ and race, crime statistics, effects of immigration, McCarthyism, what happened in South Africa and the like). He really has done some fantastic and informative pieces.

I still can't stand the smug, fallacy-abusing prick; and worse than him his his horde of half-brained sycophants. Still, credit where its due. Overall he has been a positive influence on the masses, and seeing as he is ramping up his attitudes and is encouraging less diversity, more white babies and being ready for conflict; I am not worried that he's going to re-direct our energies into something ineffective as is the case with 'controlled opposition' leaders.

0
0

[–] 16340133? ago 

Name one time he used a fallacy.

0
0

[–] 16341908? ago 

"Facts don't matter".

0
0

[–] 16340957? ago 

Go through his debate videos. He has one where he's talking to some crazies about flat-earth and UFOs; and he uses the argument 'do you really think you are smarter than all these people who came before you'? (Appeal to authority). He also ridiculed the one guy for working in a warehouse and implied that due to his 'bad job' he should not think that he is intelligent or capable of making an argument (ad hominem). He regularly uses rhetorical devices to exploit his often awkward and nervous callers. There's a host of other things he does regularly as well that I am not bothered to list. I pointed this out in one of those videos (either the flat-earth or the UFO one; and no I am not a flat-earther, not that it should matter) and I got shadowbanned (and still am to this day) from his channel.

0
0

[–] 16340951? ago 

Everytime he justifies jewish global power based on iq and christianity banning usury, without giving it the same investigation as he does say S Africa, which he incidentally completely omitted the role that jews played in apartheid, gold, diamonds and then the ripping apart of apartheid when it suited.

0
0

[–] 16339202? ago 

Remember that Jewish caller he had and he was all

ethnostate for me but not for thee

and Moly called him out on it. He knows what's up

0
0

[–] 16340132? ago 

Yes that definitely wasn't staged in the exact same week that there was a thread about that scenario on /pol/, and it also happened to Richard Spencer at a debate. I mean, what are the chances… right?

load more comments ▼ (37 remaining)