He certainly doesn't look like a jew.
There were "jews" in the Third Reich who abandoned their cult, way of life, traditions and ideologies to adopt that of the Germanic way of life. Surprise surprise, parents who are 10% semitic, and claim to be jewish can have a son who doesn't identify with that lineage or cult.
Third Reich didn't have a one drop rule.
Not defending this e-celeb, who has had opinions all over the spectrum and cannot be trusted, but this idea that partial jews cannot absolutely detest and abandon that part of their lineage is just more jewry. It plays into the hands of jews, and they know, that this kind of divisive puritanism can serve as endless source of D&C. Why? Because in America, nearly everyone is mixed, either mixed European or some other kind of mongrelization. Racial segregation occurs through spousal choice, then in the later stages of this conflict, when we can return to a technocratic tribal way of life.
Whilst I generally hate e-celebs, and Molyneux is perhaps the most arrogant and narcissistic prick out there who is actually terrible at debating and regularly uses logical fallacies himself, despite being quick to criticise others for doing so; his 'documentaries' are actually top-tier. I do not have to like man or accept any of his beliefs to be able to admit that he is good at informing people about what happens in regards to high-publicity events and those things which the media downplays (like IQ and race, crime statistics, effects of immigration, McCarthyism, what happened in South Africa and the like). He really has done some fantastic and informative pieces.
I still can't stand the smug, fallacy-abusing prick; and worse than him his his horde of half-brained sycophants. Still, credit where its due. Overall he has been a positive influence on the masses, and seeing as he is ramping up his attitudes and is encouraging less diversity, more white babies and being ready for conflict; I am not worried that he's going to re-direct our energies into something ineffective as is the case with 'controlled opposition' leaders.
Go through his debate videos. He has one where he's talking to some crazies about flat-earth and UFOs; and he uses the argument 'do you really think you are smarter than all these people who came before you'? (Appeal to authority). He also ridiculed the one guy for working in a warehouse and implied that due to his 'bad job' he should not think that he is intelligent or capable of making an argument (ad hominem). He regularly uses rhetorical devices to exploit his often awkward and nervous callers. There's a host of other things he does regularly as well that I am not bothered to list. I pointed this out in one of those videos (either the flat-earth or the UFO one; and no I am not a flat-earther, not that it should matter) and I got shadowbanned (and still am to this day) from his channel.
Everytime he justifies jewish global power based on iq and christianity banning usury, without giving it the same investigation as he does say S Africa, which he incidentally completely omitted the role that jews played in apartheid, gold, diamonds and then the ripping apart of apartheid when it suited.
[–] 16366403? ago
Saying a jew's name is not "naming the jew," retard.