[–] EnlightenedWave 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
It’s just astounding to me because she believed that sort of anyi-LGBT stuff when she was 19 and renounced it in her early to mid 20’s. Tulsi Gabbard is 37 now I think and has a perfect record for supporting gay rights and such in Congress...
They’re talking about stuff she said 20 years ago like she said it yesterday or something. That community is... amazingly dumb.
[–] derram 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
2020 Democratic Presidential Primary | OT | Birtherism, again? I didn't realize Obama was back in the race | ResetEra
'Good interview with Gillibrand just gone up on Crooked media. '
'Definitely an underrated candidate and one to watch; for whatever policy changes she has made along the way as she has transitioned into the senate, she comes across as real, and approachable, and relatable. '
'The least forced or hammy candidate that has announced so far, hands down. '
' She could be a reaaal winner and take people by surprise. '
[–] TyroneLannister 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Gabbard seems more interesting to me the more Reset screams about her. Trump vs. Gabbard in 2020 would be a delicious time to watch the meltdowns.
[–] kabartanto ago
I would never vote for her due to her pro-DACA and anti-gun views. But I'd rather have her as a president than another neocon or neolib.
[–] SpaceC0w 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Oh man, I don't know what they'd even do! I'm sure a number of them would vote for Gabbard as the lesser of two evils. Some would restructure their brains to think Gabbard was good. The rest? Rioting on the streets with Antifa.