0
0

[–] 16313489? ago 

Yeah I am not advocating a stance where everything needs to be flawless. I believe strongly in giving the benefit of the doubt. When there is enough there to see it's purposeful, it's only then where I become critical. With Wictor my problem is this: I have seen enough on the issues I know a lot about to know he is giving one-sided information to the extent it's akin to propaganda on a couple of his main topics. (Saudi, GCC, Syria, Yemen, etc.) It's consistent enough you can clearly identify the faction he is siding with. (normally for an avg joe you are going to see some conflicting stands because the middle east is a cluster**** in general) His is pro Sunni regime Saudi/Israel. (since they are joined at the hip.) As Q has told us "be careful who you follow" and to specifically look at independent journalist types. I am not saying it's wrong to follow Wictor but you have to go into it knowing it's a particularly propagandized viewpoint. Like watching CNN or any other MSM source. I guess the biggest issue for me is that he does try to project this image that he is giving the real information and it sickens me how easily people fall into it because they take it at face value and trust him too much as an "expert" source because he is basically a good storyteller.

0
0

[–] 16318322? ago 

Well said. Thanks again.

Be well.