0
0

[–] 16306009? ago 

I don't turn my brain off when I read Wictor -- or you.

There is a possibility that what you are saying has some truth in it. But as long as you make gratuitous assertions, i.e. claims (or accusations) devoid of any substantive, logical support, you're pissing into the wind. (If that's your thing, no problem. Piss on.)

0
0

[–] 16306243? ago 

0
0

[–] 16306618? ago  (edited ago)

Uh... "Knee-jerk Isolationist Morons Make Things Worse: And they always have"

Won't argue with that.

Yet, I don't see how pointing out that non-isolationism (or cooperative effort) that leads to interaction with SA is verification that Wictor is a Saudi apologist. I've read a lot of Wictor's writing. Some of it is entertaining, some informative, and some is just ravings of an old madman with very eclectic roots. He no longer has ANY social media presence (by banning and by choice). He contributes to Quodverum, and as far as I can tell, that is his only presence on the web. He publishes his thoughts...some people read him.

I, for one, read Wictor...along with scores of other sources across the spectrum. If he's a propagandist, he sucks at it.

Thanks for sharing your go-to example. There are many more that would likely fit into your preconceived notions.

EDIT: And, no, I am not a Wictor apologist.

0
0

[–] 16306171? ago 

Let me dig out the go-to example I have. As long as you know logical fallacies you should be able to see what it is.