0
0

[–] WickedVocalist ago 

Pretty sure they cannot expand than to vets and formers.

0
1

[–] Steelerfish 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Caution, Recording certain government individuals may lead to Arkanicide.....

0
0

[–] jesus_is_lord ago  (edited ago)

0
2

[–] Blackjack147 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Project Veritas comes out with some really juicy bits, but I'm worried about the precedent this could set. There was a lot of espionage taking place during the Cold War. Is there a distinction to be made here?

0
2

[–] novictim [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Espionage is secret, covert, nonpublic, not presented for legal purposes. The distinction is obvious.

0
0

[–] WickedVocalist ago 

Sure, until the coppers rule of law to use it on you like you did them.

0
0

[–] selpai ago 

Proving that not all Jews are Kikes.

0
2

[–] Walk1 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I think the public needs to know what the people who represent us are up to in any manner.

0
0

[–] WickedVocalist ago 

You should be a lot more wary of the people that enforce us both and lie to you about us.

1
0

[–] Honey_Pot 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Illinois, are you listyening???

Illinois' previous eavesdropping law was among the strictest in the nation, making it illegal to record anyone, even in public, without their permission. ... Thus, the new eavesdropping law requires that all parties involved in a “private” conversation give their permission to be recorded.Jan 6, 2015

0
2

[–] Runwithscissors 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Where does the constitution say you can’t record people? Nowhere.

0
1

[–] WickedVocalist 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Privacy in that era was covered by the 2nd amendment.

0
2

[–] Onefootwonder 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Exactly. My toilet cams in the ladies bathrooms are 100% awesome.

load more comments ▼ (8 remaining)