0
0

[–] 16215239? ago 

Okay, I know you people are lurking, give me your reading material.

I Need Books Portraying National Socialism As Actually Socialist

I dont want it to be true, I want it to be something a deluded bolshevik would cling to. I dont mean Strassers works or Strassers subversions, I mean books on things like the NSV, the WHW and the NSKOV. Things that talk about money being given from one person to another as redistribution… and some obscure books on the National Socialist government in practice, not in theory. Not Feder, but something on post 34 post long knives Germany.

0
0

[–] 16215288? ago 

I mean are you under some kind of delusion than National Socialism was some kind of free market libertarian paradise ? Because you've been duped from multiple angles if you believe that, or even want it to be true.

0
0

[–] 16215294? ago 

This book gives a pretty clear look at how things were run in Germany. Though it is wartime reporting, so there would be differences from peacetime, but even in peacetime, resources were limited, and thus heavily controlled.

0
0

[–] 16215363? ago 

Book has a great intro. This is going to be a great read. Thanks.

In 1940, however, accuracy and objectivity on Hitler’s Germany was

not what was wanted by America’s intellectual and policy

establishment. Even before Into the Darkness was published, Time

magazine sniped at Stoddard as “persona grata to Nazis,” running a

grotesquely truncated version of his interview with Goebbels (already

published through the North American Newspaper Alliance). By the

time his book appeared, Germany ‘s armed forces had conquered

Denmark and Norway, overrun the Lowlands and conquered France,

and driven British troops back across the Channel. While the United

States, in accord with the wishes of the great majority of Americans,

would stay officially neutral for a further a year and half, the climate

in the publishing world, the academy, and government was such that

Stoddard felt constrained to include an apologetic “Statement” on the

book jacket. It begins “Personally repellent and depressing though

Nazi Germany was to me, as it must be to any normally-minded

American .” and continues in the same mode for two paragraphs.

Stoddard’s aim then was to salvage himself and his book by

advertising Into the Darkness as a clarion call to preparedness against

the German “New Sparta with its cult of ruthless efficiency”; today,

Stoddard’s apology for Into the Darkness stands more as a sad tribute

to the intimidating power, even then, of America’s Orwellian media

combine. One can’t help noting that none of Stalin ‘s many apologists

among American journalists seems to have felt compelled to write a

similar disclaimer.

Sixty years after it was written, the text of Into the Darkness is both a

refutation of its author’s apologia and a rebuke to his detractors. This

is a journalistic account that still lives and breathes, that informs and

entertains.

0
0

[–] 16215297? ago 

0
0

[–] 16883910? ago 

0
0

[–] 16214714? ago 

Since the kiked mods locked my bread, here's an archive link to it.

http://archive.is/UyMwZ

Contains an essay by the guy who authored the Hitlerian blog r.i.p to that blog detailing various national socialist philosophy and relating it to works by Savitri Devi, Evola, Linkola etc. Also contains links to various PDF books.

None of it is my original work, it it's very much worth reading, very enlightening information.

0
0

[–] 16215130? ago 

Thank you anon. I have been looking for a lot of these books. Finally downloading all the essentials.

0
0

[–] 16214715? ago 

it it's

but it's*

0
0

[–] 16214738? ago 

I've read most of what's out there in terms of like-criticism, but I think it's important to bring up that we should not only focus on learning about what the kikes are doing. We should be educating outselves in things that will help us to prosper. All whites should be learning about business and finance. Pic related is the book that I powered through this weekend. It gives the whole story about what corporations are, how they are set up, and why they are preferential to other types of business structures.

You can easily get enough knowledge reading books from library genesis to put you on par with a finance professional after a couple of years of reading.

Also, daily reminder to get a Kindle DX, since the small kindle is bad for reading technical PDFs. Just get a second gen DX on eBay that has a dead battery and do the battery replacement yourself.

0
0

[–] 16857958? ago 

Do you have the pdf for this book?

0
0

[–] 17716343? ago 

I just typed "the corporation wesley" into library genesis and it came up. He should have uploaded it but you should also learn to find shit yourself.

0
0

[–] 16214933? ago 

I am also interested in this branch. I tried finding back this book but its either absent or kinda expensive. Morality wise I am strong enough I feel. So who else wants to go more into the "functional" aspects of books?

0
0

[–] 16214711? ago 

I have a physical set of DIY books that have no recognizable name for Google, no copyright that I can search in any of the books, and the title is so generic it's practically worthless. How do i figure out who the hell made these books?

0
0

[–] 16214712? ago 

Maybe type passages into a search engine? How old are these books?

0
0

[–] 16214713? ago 

I don't know, they're binders of DIY instructions some guy gave to me because he asked if I wanted it, the actual trademark is Easy Home Repair. Has no timestamps in any of the binders so far.

0
0

[–] 16214722? ago 

Eventually found it but it doesn't help me much, it just lists a corporation. Guess I'd need insider knowledge to know who actually compiled all this info together.

>>12170479

Isn't library genesis still active? I think it had to switch domains but there is a whole bunch of pdfs of famous authors uploaded into it. You could also try /pdfs/ own recommendations for "online libraries".

0
0

[–] 16214726? ago 

post pics or its bullshit

0
0

[–] 16214907? ago 

Bump

0
0

[–] 16849958? ago 

0
0

[–] 16283432? ago 

0
0

[–] 16283434? ago 

>>12702964

Thanks

load more comments ▼ (23 remaining)