[–] 16469291? 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1.9 years ago
I don't see why it would be any different in 1943; not a "claim".
TIK is garbage (general comment) though what to expect from an e-celeb historydude; you won't get to the bottom of things there.
[–] 16469293? 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1.9 years ago
"e-celeb historydude" as opposed to what anon?
you need to hold back a bit with the contrarian koolaid. look to get a bit of perspective if you think he is even remotely "e-celeb" status.
video related. one of his best IMO.
Please suggest better content creators on the topic, I'd love to see more in-depth and passionate discussion. Not so easy to find IME.
[–] 16469293? ago
"e-celeb historydude" as opposed to what anon?
you need to hold back a bit with the contrarian koolaid. look to get a bit of perspective if you think he is even remotely "e-celeb" status.
video related. one of his best IMO.
Please suggest better content creators on the topic, I'd love to see more in-depth and passionate discussion. Not so easy to find IME.