[–] midnightblue1335 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
male boxers getting their shit pushed in by trans fighters.
That actually fucking happened a few weeks ago. Professional boxing. Female who had her tits lopped off beat a male Boxer.
I get what you're saying though, for every one instance like that, there are 30 where a man is fucking women up in sports while wearing a ponytail or whatever.
[–] notYOURfriend ago
You'll have to link that fight. There must have been something wrong with the guy.
[–] midnightblue1335 ago (edited ago)
Here is the link to round 1, the other rounds are in the recommended videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_WU4ECgQfs
Patricio Manuel is the female, Hugo Aguilar is the male. Hilariously, the female has more of a beard than Hugo.
Edit: It should be noted that Hugo Aguilar is a tomato can. He has a record of 0 wins, 5 losses- he was brought in to lose against the tranny freak for a publicity stunt.
[–] chubsta 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
isn't it the case with these ones though that they are allowed to take drugs which would normally be banned when used by a male, so their testosterone levels are far in excess of what is normally permissible? Couple that with the fact that the woman may be the 1 in ten thousand that has already got muscle and bone mass in excess of what a man normally has and you end up with something out of a video game.
At school there was a sheboon who EVERYONE was scared of, she was a fucking silverback and knew how to fight, this was in a small village school in the UK in the mid-70s and I am not aware of her ever losing a fight to anyone, bitch was HARD.
[–] midnightblue1335 ago
isn't it the case with these ones though that they are allowed to take drugs which would normally be banned when used by a male, so their testosterone levels are far in excess of what is normally permissible?
I researched this a bit back during the Fallon Fox controversy (the male MMA fighter, who at age 31 decided he was a woman, and then competed against females 3 times without disclosing that he has a dick, smashing those poor girls); back then, all that mattered was that the T levels were in the "normal range" and there were no banned substances in the system. So if they're taking drugs that only raise T levels to "normal" and leave no trace of the drug in the system, they can compete.
It sounds insane to me that an athletic commission would allow a female to take banned substances in order to compete with a male who is not allowed to take said substances... but we do live in Clown World. The fact that we are even having this conversation in the first place indicates to me that what you said might indeed be true.
[–] WhiteWolfSS 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Good points actually.
But I'd still rather they just stamp it out altogether at every opportunity.
[–] notYOURfriend 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I question why sports are separated to start off with. Are women not the equal of men? If I want to find the fastest runner in the world, I want to find the fastest running human in the world. Who cares what sex that person has?
Same goes for best chess player: not interested how big your dick is, I just want that person to be the best chess player.
And same goes for MMA: I want the best fighter, not the best fighter in the 200 pound weight class, I want the best.
And same goes for surgeons: I want the best surgeon to operate, not the best woman or best man.
So pool them all together, per sport, and show me who the best of them is.
[–] snarkon 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
I always figured that, like Greek original Olympics, the competitions (all men) were designed to show off the high excellence of what men's bodies could excel at. And youth, training, special builds, men's diets, etc. were really what was on display. So fast-twitch muscles, great at 50 yard sprints due to quick starts and short endurance were designed as the proper events. Stuff male bodies were excellent for.
Of course, put men vs. women in a newer event, racing 10s of miles across ice, or tolerating certain pain in other events (giving birth over 24 hours?), then maybe all the medals go to women? I bet the design of what we consider competitive sport, from the length of races or even football fields are made to show off men's physical excellence, and so they win head-to-head contests. But redesign of all the competitions, race lengths, race temperatures, agility, durability, changing the medium AWAY from the Olympic celebration of body, and I'll guess you see not just parity but places where females would consistently exceed males in competition.
But really, so what? I suppose the worst thing you could say is that the 1000 year old race boundaries influence incorrect ideas about male vs. female torsos that lead to poor conclusions about things like leadership or general power in life. Ultimately, is there a competitive design for games and play where equality of the matches is quite close regardless of sex? That might be a great rewrite in sports.
[–] ardvarcus 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
No, they don't. The medals still go to men. The old chestnut that women can endure more pain then men was exploded long ago. It's false.