0
0

[–] 16169696? ago 

hasn’t organized into a paramilitary resistance yet

implying

you realize we're keeping our ZOG at a stalemate right?

0
0

[–] 16169728? ago 

How?

0
0

[–] 16169756? ago 

How?

They can't destroy us because we have so many guns and friends, and we can't destroy them because it would invite foreign invasion. Stalemate. You could have used a dictionary, faggot.

0
0

[–] 16170277? ago 

Just look at how corrupt the system is:

California Governor Jerry Brown pardoned five men who had been convicted for violent crimes to prevent them from being deported. In addition, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo pardoned 24 criminals – including a killer – to prevent their deportation. By their actions, Brown and Cuomo have, in essence, become the knowing and willing table-setters for whatever butcheries these now-pardoned illegal-aliens/violent-criminals decide to conduct against legitimate U.S. citizens and their families during their post-pardon careers.

What, at the most basic level, is a father or husband to do to protect his family if his elected representatives deliberately choose – as have Brown and Cuomo – to augment the number of violent criminals on the loose with criminal scum who have already proven their ability and willingness to harm or kill the innocent? Brown and Cuomo are the very antithesis of defenders of “good government” and “ordered liberty”, standing instead as advocates of societal chaos, as well as of random violence against the people who elected them. Because there appears to be no governmental organization to which citizens can appeal for the quashing of the murderous pardons issued by Brown and Cuomo, citizens have, in reality, only one credible option.

If this behavior by Brown and Cuomo becomes standard operating procedure for Democratic governors, their party, and their voters and media slaves, the citizenry will have to reteach them something akin to what the 20th century taught mankind about Woodrow Wilson’s daft “right of self-determination”. The demented Wilson believed this right would be unfailingly exercised via some kind of voting, not via violence. Alas, the lamentable Woodrow was dead wrong. This right, it turns out, might be exercised through the franchise, but a Chinese lad named Mao taught the world that self-determination also is achieved – and just as justifiably – through the barrel of a gun.

Politicians releasing killers means that those niggermerican fathers and husbands have to get more weed and beer for their friends before the Super Monkey Bowl. Diversity is weakness, not strength. The jews won. The end.

0
0

[–] 16170188? ago 

1
-1

[–] 16169817? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

I just don’t get it.

ur a retard, its really not that hard to understand

0
0

[–] 16170197? ago 

Simple answer: right doesn't operate the same way left does.

Left's playbook is Rules For Radicals. If a single thing Democrats do is mysterious to you, then read the book and it'll explain everything.

0
0

[–] 16170184? ago 

0
0

[–] 16170319? ago 

Because the hardest you can go as an American "conservative" is hearkening back to the revolutionary liberal ideology of the Foundation, which was an offshoot from Europe inspired by the same ideological ferment, secret societies and merchant meddling that provoked the French Revolution, and the most hardcore Puritan and Calvinist elements in Christianity that rebelled against the Catholic tradition and fled to the New World. The American idea of conservatism is anti-traditional, materialistic and demonic, and everything since has just been the logical follow through of those same revolutionary ideas, now completely out of control. There is no far-right in America because there is no far-right in the American tradition. Anything genuinely traditional is by definition anti-American and so will always be impossible for the vast majority of the population to accept, any truly far-right movement would have to be intensely anti-American, it would need to want to reverse the revolution that founded the country and so it would be attacked on all sides and accepted by no one.

Maybe in the southern states where you had the retention of an aristocratic, anti-egalitarian and anti-technological element there was something that could have sprouted that would have been better than modern America, but that was annihilated and its territories and peoples crushed by the north.

0
0

[–] 16170586? ago 

load more comments ▼ (39 remaining)