Revolutions aren't won without foreign elite support or a tremendously weak enemy. While our enemy is weakening themselves, they are still quite strong.
There's also a problem in that the right-wing is too spread out. Some are just capitalist cucks with a hint of social traditionalism, others are full NatSoc. Coping strategies like completely inwardly-focused self-improvement and retreating to the same churches that sold out your country are adopted.
Because everyones understanding of revolutions and war come from state school focusing on the last two centuries of empire. Nobody ever learns shit about the preceding three thousand fucking years of human history and nature itself. Human history started with the american revolution for most people in the u.s. and was cavement before that.
Because revolutionaries have less support, less logistics, less training, less organization, less weapons than the government they are trying to overthrow. Everyone brings up the Vietnamese rice farmer meme but those aren't wins so much as the attacking country got bored and left. Also, they are the ATTACKING country. They're the ones that have to deal with the logistics issues. In the case of a revolution, we're talking about a smaller, less elite force attacking a bigger, established, better trained force. Winning such a thing would be damn near impossible without perfect operations, destroying tons of infrastructure and high-ranking officers, which would essentially leave nothing left, and at that point the attacking force (which I would assume to be us, right-leaning white guys) would have to fend off a million other pretenders to the throne; just because we took down the government doesn't mean we automatically become the new government.
[–] 16170207? ago
Because the country is fucking huge and nobody wants to move to the Northwest.