Azov
Right Sector
IRA
UVF
This is not how any of this works. Right Sector and Azov are mercenaries working for the Ukrainian government - they're far right but they don't really fall under "militarized right wing resistance groups". They helped with the, primarily left-wing, pro-EU student protests back before Donbass split-off but now they're mainly used as a way to engage in extralegal conflict with the Donbass rebels and Russian support personnel and as well so that certain Ukrainian politicians acquire power and wealth for themselves.
The IRA, while predominantly catholic, was split between ideologically neutral republicans and socialists. I would hardly call the socialists that run much of today's IRA remnants "the militarized right wing".
The UVF, likewise, nothing like it. They were, essentially, a sort of SDF/loyalist faction though now they're kind of like the IRA in that they primarily exist as splinter groups of semi-radical, sometimes-violent good-boys-clubs.
Furthermore, on the topic of the IRA and UVF remnants, they're mostly either really old people or really young people LARPing around.
The AWB is the only group here that you could call a legitimate "far right resistance militia" or "the militarized right wing" and there's plenty like them in the US just like there's plenty of less extreme militias.
"boomers"
The reason the AWB has a lower boomer-to-zoomer ratio than your average southern militia is that South African kids grow up in a third world shit-hole where they're actively being victimized for their race. White American kids, by contrast, have nothing to worry about unless they live in very specific areas. So the legal responsibility to maintain the "government of the people, by the people, for the people" is mainly respected by older generations - especially since those generations were raised in an environment where this sort of sentiment was fostered by contrast to today's "you're not hip if you're not global" mood.
Also, because there's no real need for the American right to militarize until the very last moment. It's precisely because so many people have guns and it's easy and possible to congregate and communicate that these sorts of things aren't necessary - likewise the pressures are nowhere near so great.
Ukraine broke out into mass civil strife and outright civil war, South Africa is passing kristalnacht into law where there was already massive discrimination and violence against Whites in many areas, the Irish felt themselves under foreign occupation, the UVF formed in response to The Troubles and you get my point.
The American far right isn't going to organize because they're just as likely to be shot at by the authorities as other, even anti-authority militias.
Because anyone that fights gets dogpiled by groups of cuckservative larpers and PRfags looking to suck up to ZOG/based niggers.
[–] 16169763? ago
Because the sol called "smart ones" spent so many time gathering information and becoming cynical that none of them want to die for a cause.
"Muh the leftists are useful idiots that die for their masters". Yes. And they get results for their masters.
The Right has no master, and does not serve anyone, and don't want to throw it's life away for a bet, a chance. Tha chance being the advancing of it's goals.
Thos "too dumb to preserve themselves" are fighting and attacking.
Those "too smart to throw their lives away for an uncertain victory" are being attacked and retreating.
[–] 16169764? ago
I see people who were once dead living again.
They're aware and preparing for a fight they hope never comes.
[–] 16169926? ago
Hopefully so.
But for now, i only see "dumb, but winning" vs "smart, but losing".