0
0

[–] 16204400? ago 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5007135/

Notice this is what a proper source looks like.

>>12688794

Staying blue pilled, I see.

You made up a sentence ex nilho and then proceeded to argue against it. This is a textbook strawman.

First of all

You made statements which were true on condition of dose and patient. There are few absolute statements in medicine like those you made, because it always depends upon specific conditions. In this case, dose and age.

Secondly, when dealing with cancer causing agents and radiation the "zero exposure" system is used in which "no amount of exposure is to be considered safe."

You are exposed to radiation every day from cosmic background radiation, fallout from nuclear weapons testing decades ago, Fukushima's contamination of the environment, naturally occurring radioisotopes of carbon and potassium. Need I go on?

Why is it "hand waved"

D O S E

O

S

E

This is a foundational concept in medicine and physiology. Do you have ANY idea how many random chemicals you are bombarded with every day? Of course not, because you are too busy asking the wrong questions. Sit down and read about dose. Read about the father of chemical warfare and how dosage was discovered to relate to poison.

Why is knowledge of it suppressed?

It's clearly not suppressed if uneducated people like you have such easy access to it. Why am I snarky, you ask? Because I have already given you the answer several times: DOSE DOSE DOSE. Yet you ignore it. Not only that, you invent sentences and respond to them, demonstrating dishonesty.

Exactly, and the results are cherry-picked.

You never read the literature. I know this because you lack foundational knowledge of chemistry and biology. You are in no position to make this claim. You probably don't even know what a primary source is. You probably think "National Geographic" is a journal.

No one should be crippled by autism and brain damage.

Good news then, because vaccines don't cause autism. I'll take this as your tacit support of vaccination of children.

That does not mean that environmental toxins cannot radically alter a person's health and/ or development.

The research specifically indicates a GENETIC and NOT an environmental (mercury from vaccines) cause. In other words, you once again show a startling lack of reading comprehension.

It seems that autism essentially did not exist before the rise of vaccines

According to what? The gaping assumption pulled out of your ass? What we call autism is a name for assigned to a disease. Not having a name doesn't mean the disease didn't exist. That's not how cause and effect works. I'll also need a DOI link to that journal you just cited about a causal relationship between vaccines and autism. What was its name again? "Armchair Weekly?"

I have already listed several explanations for the apparent rise of autism. Women having children later in life was one of those explanations.

Then we need better vaccines that use non-toxic stabilizers and preservatives.

Spoken by a true doctor of Not-Chemistry. Look, how about you leave discussion of the biochemistry and chemistry of preservatives to us chemists and take your condescending arrogance elsewhere?

I specifically pointed out that, yes, vaccines work, but they currently contain toxic brain-damaging compounds.

They contain chemicals which WOULD be toxic IF they were in HIGHER doses.

There's that word again. Dose.

To Hel with your "herd mentality." People die all the time from many different things. Life is not safe.

People die of mistakes and events out of our control. You are willingly causing more death for an imaginary benefit because you're uneducated and arrogant.

If you want to "contain stupid people" then support White separation into racial homelands (immediate huge jump in intelligence) followed by sensible eugenics.

I assure you, that if I wanted to use eugenics against stupid people, your testicles would be the first on the chopping block.

So, SOME people might die from not being vaccinated

More ignorance of fundamentals in medicine. Not everyone has a working immune system, due to age, congenital disorders, genetic diseases, and of course AIDS. Herd immunity protects people who could not benefit from vaccination directly.

"Pro-vaxxers"

Aka people who know how to read scientific literature.

0
0

[–] 16238131? ago 

(((National Center for Biotechnology Information)))

proper source

0
0

[–] 16338584? ago 

Nigger are you retarded?

0
0

[–] 16239575? ago 

pic

What's that about, phylogeny? Belonging to the same clade =/= being literally identical - that's just what anti-science Liberal freaks want people to think.

0
0

[–] 16204861? ago 

appeal to authority

denies proven link between vaccines autism

argues in favor of "herd immunity"

claims that a toxic substance isn't toxic if the dosage is low

deliberately mentions mercury in vaccines (no proven link to autism), ignores aluminum in vaccines (proven link to autism)

entire post radiates "insufferable cunt" at a higher rate than the sun emits gamma rays

0
0

[–] 16227024? ago 

I'm not saying that you are doing that but to be added to the list you posted.

0
0

[–] 16227022? ago 

Don't forget this little number

Ad-hominem

0
0

[–] 16204401? ago 

You are a jew OR you are shilling for them because you are so desperate for people to believe that vaccines do no harm.

You are calling the person an idiot, but at the very same time you are determined to get them to believe that vaccines are safe.

Since you think so little of them to call them an idiot, the question of "WHY does this person feel the need to convince someone who he doesn't like on the internet, about vaccines being safe?"

Answer: It's because you KNOW that they aren't safe and desperately want everyone to believe that they are safe to fuck everybody's health up while you guys go around scoffing at all the conditions that result from vaccines.

All the jews go around saying things like "You're autistic" as an insult and now the latest one is all of you are mocking people with jaundice knowing what causes it, you all love to laugh at all the goyim having it and not knowing what causes it.

You then go around SCOFFING at everyone with the conditions that you are causing and then get mad when people who are trying to warn everybody because it puts a spanner in your plans.

People have become so aware now that you are now bringing in LAWS to put people in jail trying to expose it just like those little "holocaust" questioning laws that were brought in.

I've got news for you.

The pharmaceutical industry has only got so much time left before it collapses because as the days go by, people are becoming more and MORE aware that they can fix themselves without the "need" for the pharmaceutical doctor.

But the main thing is that people are becoming aware of what is going on and will eventually be able to see through all the shit that you guys put out.

You can't stop everyone.

You can't put EVERYone in jail and if you do try that, then that will be the time everyone will stand up.

I give the pharmaceutical industry another 20 years until it's completely squashed, 35 years MAX.

Good luck with it, cause your going to need it.

0
0

[–] 16240719? ago 

Explain the real cause of jaundice?