0
0

[–] nycpats ago 

We confirm the judge first. Then we can address your concerns.

This motherf!cker. 2020.

0
0

[–] Davelon ago 

To be honest from what I've been reading here and on the chans, I'm not too sure there will be a 'Papacy' as such for much longer. I'd be much more concerned about the Muslim influence within the Fed Gov and other positions of influence than worry about the Catholics.

0
1

[–] HISdaughter 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

When the crimes the Vatican has committed is revealed, I believe a large number (worldwide) will find it so horrific they will leave so I don't think the Catholicism of the Supreme Court Justices will matter. Mark Taylor prophesied this as well as one entitled All Roads Lead to Rome.

0
1

[–] G45Colt 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Catholic schools tend to have very strong educational foundations. So I think it's the educational foundation that is leading many towards positions requiring strong intellect.

As far as the indoctrination goes, its going to be hit or miss, depending on the person, just like anything else. If they learned anything at all, they should have gained a strong sense of right and wrong. But, if you teach a person HOW to think, don't expect them to follow too closely in your footsteps. They are more likely to blaze their own trail.

The greater danger is the indoctrination / lack of solid education that we are now seeing in the public school system. And the lack of a solid moral foundation.

0
0

[–] Publius1778 [S] ago 

Yes all very true and certainly part of the answer, but I don't think it is sufficient. Also you need to look into the power, funding and control of jesuit highschools in D.C. as well as of Georgetown itself.

0
0

[–] Paladin_Diver ago 

Spot on.

0
0

[–] Habakkuk212 ago  (edited ago)

In my opinion, one's moral compass is made evident by one's walk. The schools attended are not a reliable predictor. John Roberts cannot be trusted because he twisted the clear statement of the law that the Obamacare individual mandate penalty was not a tax, and said it was a tax, all in order to accommodate Obama. He is willing to twist the law to achieve a political outcome.
In contrast, Clarence Thomas is as straight up and honest as can be hoped for. I think he walks before the Lord with integrity. And as for Sotomayor, what evidence is there that any Catholic or Christian values remain in her? Her track record indicates that she cares not one whit for the sanctity of human life or moral purity or marital fidelity. She votes in whatever direction the political winds carry her. Catholics and Protestants alike who fear the Lord and love the Lord, walk with moral allegiance to the Lord and with national allegiance to our Constitution.