0
1

[–] thelma 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Weinstein "appeared in his bathrobe, and, instead of discussing film roles, asked if he could give her a massage."

------------- it was casual Tuesday .... Those Judd's ? They're all fucking commies, ya know.

0
1

[–] Inaminit 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I'm laughing at her and her retarded lawyer.

0
3

[–] the_sharpest_knife 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

If he sexually assaulted someone that's one thing but every case I've heard about him seems to be nothing different than hiring a prostitute.

1
4

[–] qanon1776 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

I might feel sorry for her as an actress had she not made such a mockery of President Trump's 2016 win. She admitted she was a nasty woman and nasty women get themselves in nasty positions (so to speak).

0
4

[–] freedomite 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Guess jews are just higher on the oppression pyramid than feminists.

Who could have predicted this...

1
4

[–] tonberry2 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago  (edited ago)

It was thrown out on a technicality:

"Judge Philip Gutierrez wrote in his ruling Judd's relationship as an actress with the film producer was not covered under the California statute Judd had sued under. Further, although the law was changed in 2018 to include producer/actress relationship, Gutierrez said it couldn't be applied retroactively. The judge said he wasn't determining whether Judd was sexually harassed by Weinstein "in the colloquial sense of the term."

What does he mean he can't apply the law "retroactively"? She is suing him now, in 2018, when the law applies.

3
0

[–] BlackGrapeDrank 3 points 0 points (+3|-3) ago 

such a jew rule.

0
1

[–] PewterKey 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Say a law is passed to make posting on voat illegal. It would only apply to future posts, because it is an insane burden to expect any member of society to respect both the current laws of the country and the hypothetical future laws.

This is why full auto guns still exist in private hands, they were grandfathered in. They were legal and thus stay legal. Just like Ms. Judd's relationship was legal and now stays legal. Also who becomes the criminal in a mutual relationship is highly questionable. Weinstein could be sueing Judd with just one switch of the legal lettering. Or both could be at fault to a 3rd party.

0
2

[–] FreeinTX 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Ex post facto. If I do something legal today, and tomorrow the law changes, you can't hold me accountable the following day for breaking that law.

0
7

[–] FuckRedditInTheAss 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

What does he mean he can't apply the law "retroactively"? She is suing him now, in 2018, when the law applies.

Because the relationship they had (producer/actress) wasn't one of the covered relationships when it allegedly occurred (pre-2018). You can't retroactively make something illegal.

0
0

[–] tonberry2 ago 

Thanks for clearing that up. I think her problem was that she sued under the new law, she probably would have had a case if she just did a standard sexual harassment and defamation suit.

0
16

[–] 16025237? 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

I have a lot of sympathy for Ms. Judd...it must really be a difficult transition from sucking and fucking your way to prosperity and then being usurped by the same women you ought to have tried to protect and discarded by the same men you sold your soul to

0
0

[–] john_mccains_tumor ago 

Someone should post a list of actresses that were Weinstein'd - would give their performances in film a new dynamic. Have a little pop up window in movies like "X-Men" during certain scenes [reminder: Jennifer Lawrence swallowed jew cock for this scene]

0
6

[–] 16025789? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

At least Weinstein seems to have gone for adult women. There are far worse in the business, that's for sure.

0
0

[–] DavidHogg ago 

And most likely somewhat consensual between him and the women. They wanted fame and he wanted a blowjob.

0
0

[–] IDintDuNuthin2 ago 

+1 respect for Harvey because of this

1
0

[–] BlkRifleCoffeeCancer 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Gotta look at the positives.