Congratulations implementing a copyright policy for child abuse imagery.
D = CV*min(1,FR/FV)-CR, in any media market. Increase FR, risk of a non-paying interaction, you increase the production rate.
This idea that it produces demand is like if walmart was selling snow shovels. But one bright employee figured out how to duplicate the shovels in stock for free. So walmart started selling more shovels, and then we pretended this would place a lot of demand on the original manufacturer. This theory of demand doesn't make any sense. But the theory of competing means to obtain a media is as proven as proven gets. People will select whatever they think gives them the most benefit for the cost. It takes a lot for Free with zero risk to be beat with not free and not zero risk. But you start applying risk to someone who doesn't pay and a minority of the distribution finds that a commercial interaction is worth while. This is how copyright works.
Yeah, it's a little dense.
So the idea is that in a media market people have a choice between downloading something for free or paying for it. They are going to weigh the cost vs benefit. People are comparing the value of having gotten it by torrent or paying vs the risk and money of using torrent or paying. This is true for all media markets.
So we say that someone pays if:
CV/(P+CR) > FV/FR
C means commercial, V means value (what they get out of it), P means price, R means risk, and F means non-commercial.
P+CR is what someone pays for a commercial interaction. If purchasing music obviously there is no risk, so P+CR=P. But in the case of something illicit then the CR is a part of the cost. So if you get more bang for the buck for a commercial interaction you will pursue a commercial interaction.
Well on the other side of the inequality we see FV/FR. That will have an infinite bang for buck in all cases if the FR is zero. That means no one will ever engage in a commercial interaction. Another way of saying this is the P necessary to satisfy the inequality would have to be less than zero. That P becomes the demand curve, because a demand curve is asking at what price would someone pay for something.
So that's the main point but I can derive that formula for you really quick if you want to read on.
So there is one more condition of there being a commercial interaction that we need to factor in.
CV>CR+P
That is if a commercial interaction has less value than its cost it obviously won't happen independent of what is going on with FV/FR.
So lets combine these two facts to solve for P.
P<CV-CR
P< CV*FR/FV-CR
So maximum P that anyone will pay is less than both of those figures on the right.
Pmax=min(CV-CR,CV*FR/FV-CR) which we will now call D because we have a demand curve.
So that min statement is kind of complicated but we can simplify it.
First off we have a -CR in both cases.
D = min(CV,CV*FR/FV)-CR
Now we have a CV in both
D = CV*min(1,FR/FV)-CR
So obviously different people see different value in each kind of interaction and different risk. So each variable is a distribution. But the important thing is that if the FR distribution is universally zero then the demand curve is universally zero. Also what is interesting is no amount of CR will offset the effect of even the tiniest amount of FR, because of the effect of subtracting a distribution form a distribution vs the multiplication of a distribution with anything beside zero.
Also what is interesting is that cap of 1 on FR/FV. Basically what this says is that a media market cannot exceed a conventional market. If FR/FV were infinite basically you would just have a conventional market. This is of course what most media companies would like to achieve. You can't download a toothbrush and if FR/FV were infinite people would have to buy music like it were a toothbrush. One purchase for every instance out there.
But oddly the anti-cp laws are trying to achieve the same FR/FV ratio.
[–] shewhomustbeobeyed 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
vg - https://archive.vn/EdzOP translated
[–] IShallNotFear 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
That page is still in Norwegian. Here is the translation into English. http://archive.vn/b4rlD
Thanks, still haven't quite figured out how to translate archives, working on it though.
[–] Vindicator [M] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
@Anonj456, thanks for posting. Per Rule 2, you need to add the link to the news of the arrests, though, not just an imgr pic. I'll give you the 24 Hour Grace flair so you can edit. Thanks.
[–] EricKaliberhall [M] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Thank you @Anonj456. I will remove the 24hr Grace flair.
I am Swedish so I understood the article from Världens Gång. Well done Norge!
[–] Angelis_Solaris 1 point 7 points 8 points (+8|-1) ago (edited ago)
You think they named this in the wake of Infinity War? I find it to be an interesting name for this type of operation. In any case, I'm grateful to these investigators, imagine how much safer Oslo will be after these people are made aware they are not safe and that these crimes won't go unprosecuted.
Pedophilia is becoming a huge problem, not only because it always has been in human history, but because regular pornography is designed to desensitize the brain to the point where normal sexual stimulation is impossible, leading the drug of choice transformed into more extreme types of pornography. Although there are many pedophiles who are actually proud of what they do and/or actually want to harm children, there are many who do not want to be addicted to any kind of pornography at all and who weren't always interested in child pornography, and who also still retain their old simplistic society-ingrained beliefs that pedophiles are all evil and incurable, but that anything short of that is just fine as long as it's consensual (nonsense); and there are many as well who would never harm a child and care about children, but are becoming increasingly tempted to for the sake of getting any type of stimulation they can.
It used to be that most pedophiles were survivors of some form of child abuse, but now, because of the prevalence of pornography, millions more are suffering abuse from, as it were, an inanimate object. The brain does not care that it is a computer screen. It simply registers visual and audible senses and releases the appropriate hormones. If you are exposed to pornography as a child (try to recall the sheer horror of that experience), those sustained high hormone levels will often lead to PTSD and the beginning of an addiction that is often a straight road to child pornography.
Pro-pornography advocates do not like to believe the science behind this because they seek to justify their own illicit behavior, and protect themselves from the possibility that they are pedophiles in-embryo. I once met a therapist who did this very thing, though he could not cite any evidence that would back up his claims.
I do not believe that the scourge of brainwashed-induced pedophilia among western civilizations leads to irreversible pedophilia. But I could be wrong on that point. This is something that needs immediate attention by all concerned citizens and governments, and a series of summits should be held by local governments and citizen action groups to decide what is to be done about this growing problem(if people wanted to be realistic and responsible about this issue).
[–] auralsects 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
there are many who do not want to be addicted to any kind of pornography at all and who weren't always interested in child pornography
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1-5jVqW8AEfLKZ.jpg
https://pp.vk.me/c638323/v638323307/2a56f/fw_-56Ro36s.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DdCF-LTWsAAL3st.jpg
https://fitzinfo.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/al-goldstein-jews-in-pornography.jpg
he said it not me.
this isn't controversial, they even guest lecture to our daughters at universities like it's totally fine: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vIEDZGy8kA
Porn was illegal until Jewish lawyers and activists lobbied to make it "artistic expression" under the 1st amendment. One of them I even connected to pizzagate.
They're just laughing at you all and you don't even have the balls to Name your adversary.
We deserve this: the teen pregnancies, rise in girls needing surgery for prolapsed anuses, the porn addiction epidemic, the "grooming" cases, we deserve all of it.
[–] Angelis_Solaris ago (edited ago)
I personally think it's the Jesuits and Vatican who are controlling world events, with a secret doctrine of Luciferianism overlayed by a false Christianity. But I could be wrong.
Also, I didn't know porn used to be illegal. Yes, I agree it should always have stayed that way.
And that video is beyond disgusting
[–] Vindicator 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Pedophilia is becoming a huge problem, not only because it always has been in human history, but because regular pornography is designed to desensitize the brain to the point where normal sexual stimulation is impossible, leading the drug of choice transformed into more extreme types of pornography.
Yes. We should have a really good research roundup thread on the stats that back up this phenomenon.
When I was journalist a couple of decades ago, I did a feature on a local private detective who had a contract with the state Dept. of Corrections to desensitize pedos by exposing them to porn along with noxious stimulous (as I recall something that made them puke) to recondition them. He was a polygraph expert who used that and a sexual arousal monitoring gadget. They couldn't graduate from the program until both measurement devices confirmed no response to CP. It was a new program back then. I do wonder if it had any impact on the recidivism rate. I'm sure it was probably scrapped as "cruel and unusual punishment" at some point.
[–] NoBS 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Behavior Modification is a doubled edged sword. Pedophilia is as curable as any "successful" ritual abuse survivors.
Notice I mentioned "successful". If programed abuse is successful then only chemical enslavement is the cure. As soon as a young impressionable mind breaks, impulse control becomes permanently damaged and will NEVER return until rebirth.
[–] truthdemon ago (edited ago)
It might of worked...but with the agenda of the deep state ..to keep the debt system expanding , sexualisation is a necessity for them... The food that is hormone charged ...and carefully crafted media programs...programs humans to be androud bots chasing desires... An android would work for.pittance if he gets his fix of cheap sex drugs and rock and roll at the end of hia working hours or weekend.. Sex Drug ..Rock and Roll.. ie .SDR's for the consumption of the debt droids..that creates the account receivables forncompanies that r securitised at the investmnet banks backed by US treasury bills via a technique called collateral transformation ..The GDP creates SDRs for the country at the BIS country accounts in Geneva
..SDRs programmed at the local level drive SDRs at the Bank of International Settlements.
Collateralntransformation is when an investment bank loans trasury bills to hedge funds in exchange for high interest corpirate bonds These corporate bonds are driven by the amount of account receivables it can securitise and service these corporate bonds..
The only way out is using our credit to destroy debt ..and we can do that at the US treasury..the US becomes our trustee inside the peace game where all assets and credits are surrendered to the birth trust.. Till the we registere all our assets to the war game ..residing inside a war jurisdiction..funded by us warring agaisnt our own estate birth trust..by loaning its credit to the debt system..
Ignorance of this is what is called Saytan Mahaa Maaya..the great illusion
We r under foreign military jurisdiction..with the US ran as the Roman war corporation for our birth trusts.. When we use the brith trusts to reduce debt..we declare peace and becone beneficiaries to the rima trust..holding surety rights over the Crown via the US corporatiin
Till then .....
[–] Angelis_Solaris ago (edited ago)
That's interesting, I do wonder if something like that could work. I remember reading an account of an alcoholic who underwent a similar treatment, where he was made to puke after ingesting alcohol. His was quite a severe case of addiction; he had lost his family, house, job, and everything else. Well, it turns out that the treatment worked at first for him, but because he already knew that drinking would not do that normally and because the itch for alcohol never actually left (it had only been one or two weeks of inpatient sobriety) he quickly entered back into the addiction.
Years later, after hitting "rock bottom" (not sure what that really means but he said it was key; some kind of place of humility maybe?) he was able to recover completely and has a new family and a new life. Through religion, twelve steps, hitting "rock bottom" and giving his life to God (somehow), he was able to make a return. So this was his account anyway
[–] VeryOffended 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Oh wow, I would love to read more about this. Since you said you're sure it was scrapped (I'm sure you're right), have you looked into whether any phase of this study has been documented online? I'm very interested in the polygraph aspects/results. The only thing cruel about this is the use of CP in the treatment, which is necessary for this study/treatment of an addict/offender. I hate how things can be turned around into "cruel and unusual punishment" in terms of the abuser or potential abuser.
[–] ArcAngel 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
and no arrests of shit-skins bcuz it islamophobic. good-bye